Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 09:37 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
Hi,
Do we agree on using
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12312765 to
define what's preventing us from making a first release?
This definitely helps. Up to now, I just scanned the list of
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Vidar Ramdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-352
Any possibility for incorporating this in 1.0?
--
Vidar S. Ramdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.idium.no
Akersgata 16, N-0158 Oslo, Norway
We're building a large-scale web CMS, so scalability will be
important. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to cluster Sling
instances?
--
Vidar S. Ramdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.idium.no
Akersgata 16, N-0158 Oslo, Norway
Better way to define the node name for a newly created node
---
Key: SLING-354
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Create separate project for the BundleResourceProvider
--
Key: SLING-356
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-356
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Resource
Support simple path mappings for bundle provided resources
--
Key: SLING-357
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-357
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi,
I would like to fix SLING-354 and SLING-355 asap. What do you think
about the proposed changes?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Vidar,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:25 +0200 schrieb Vidar Ramdal:
We're building a large-scale web CMS, so scalability will be
important. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to cluster Sling
instances?
While I am not a specialist in Clustering, here are my thoughts.
The basis is that
It works!
Thanks,
Juanjo
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Juanjo,
This problem is caused by the jackrabbit-jcr-rmi version 1.4 library not
being complete. This issue will be fixed in the upcoming (vote under
way) version 1.4.1 library.
As
Hi Juanjo,
This problem is caused by the jackrabbit-jcr-rmi version 1.4 library not
being complete. This issue will be fixed in the upcoming (vote under
way) version 1.4.1 library.
As soon as this vote has passed and the release published, I will update
the respective Jackrabbit 1.4 Eclipse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585484#action_12585484
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-355:
Yes, I mean the case where a request
Hi,
... I would like to fix SLING-354 and SLING-355 asap. What do you think about
the proposed changes?...
Ok with both changes (assuming you include/update the tests ;-), see
my comment in SLING-355.
-Bertrand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585479#action_12585479
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-355:
---
I assume by empty value you mean a
Hi,
I´m using CRX Eclipse Plugin (http://www.day.com/eclipse/) with Jackrabbit
version 1.4 and RMI protocol. I´m getting this error when trying to connect
to the repository:
org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.client.RemoteRepositoryException: error
unmarshalling return; nested exception is:
Webloader sample mini-application
-
Key: SLING-358
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-358
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Extensions
Reporter: Bertrand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz resolved SLING-358.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed in revision 644707, see the README.txt files under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-354:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
Better way to define the node name for a newly created node
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-354.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Better way to define the node name for a newly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-355:
--
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
Empty Request Parameters should be handled as not present
sling/sling.js path hidden by Sling console
---
Key: SLING-359
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-359
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Felix Meschberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 12:51 + schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+public final static String SLING_JS_PATH = /bundles/sling/sling.js;
Didn't we say /system/sling.js or something like that instead
of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz resolved SLING-359.
---
Resolution: Fixed
In revision 644731, sling.js is served as /system/sling.js
Hi Bertrand,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Felix Meschberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 12:51 + schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+public final static String SLING_JS_PATH =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585597#action_12585597
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on SLING-354:
if you 'know' the node name, you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585598#action_12585598
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on SLING-355:
it depends on the use case. sometimes a
I would like to fix SLING-354 and SLING-355 asap. What do you think about
the proposed changes?
see my comments in the issues.
btw: i have another issue for the post servlet. i want to introduce
the possibility to copy nodes. i'll come up with a jira issue later.
--
toby
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585608#action_12585608
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-354:
Sometimes, you can't make up the post url
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585611#action_12585611
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-355:
-
I agree with you Tobias, yet what is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585618#action_12585618
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on SLING-355:
well, an empty string can also mean i see
why did you change this without a proper jira issue?
i think that all clients that rely on this need to be informed.
regards, toby
On 4/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: cziegeler
Date: Fri Apr 4 09:05:04 2008
New Revision: 644750
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585632#action_12585632
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on SLING-359:
the consensus seems to be to address this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585638#action_12585638
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-355:
-
what was the resolution on this? why is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585645#action_12585645
]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on SLING-355:
ok. consistency is better :-) removing all
so, why don't you introduce some kind of flag that will specify the
required behaviour: checkin or not?
regards,
philipp
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Tobias Bocanegra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while working with Sing I noticed that nodes declaring mixin node type
mix:versionable are not
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Philipp Koch:
so, why don't you introduce some kind of flag that will specify the
required behaviour: checkin or not?
Same time - same thinking ;-)
Regards
Felix
regards,
philipp
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Tobias Bocanegra
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 10:17 -0700 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra:
while working with Sing I noticed that nodes declaring mixin node type
mix:versionable are not checked in when the initial content is loaded.
This is somehow unexpected to me and can lead to some trouble if you rely
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:53 -0700 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra:
unless the bundles are not stored in the repository as well (which is
not possible in the current version), you also need to deploy them on
each instance, of course.
There are two cases of bundles stored in the repository:
so, why don't you introduce some kind of flag that will specify the
required behaviour: checkin or not?
Same time - same thinking ;-)
well, there is already such a flag: the jcr:isCheckedOut' property.
so if the content has a 'jcr:isCheckedOut == true', then it should
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 12:11 -0700 schrieb Tobias Bocanegra:
so, why don't you introduce some kind of flag that will specify the
required behaviour: checkin or not?
Same time - same thinking ;-)
well, there is already such a flag: the jcr:isCheckedOut'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585716#action_12585716
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-351:
-
Apart from a minor error:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Alexander
Klimetschek:
Am 03.04.2008 um 10:06 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
My larger concern is that those resources, served by bundles, are not
discoverable. What I love when working with a JCR repository (like on
a unixish system)
Hi Vidal,
Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:26 +0200 schrieb Vidar Ramdal:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Vidar Ramdal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-352
Any possibility for incorporating this in 1.0?
Sorry for not answering earlier, I was
Hi Betrand
Am Mittwoch, den 02.04.2008, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...maybe an API
call such as
boolean canHandle(SlingHttpServletRequest)
in an interface, which a servlet may implement.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585730#action_12585730
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-359:
-
Currently the docroot mapping is not
Relocate Sling Console
--
Key: SLING-360
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-360
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Console
Reporter: Felix Meschberger
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585730#action_12585730
]
fmeschbe edited comment on SLING-359 at 4/4/08 1:13 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585765#action_12585765
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-356:
-
Removed BundleResourceProvider from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585766#action_12585766
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-356:
-
Keeping this issue open until the new
The sling/sample module fails to compile JSP scripts when run in a reactor build
Key: SLING-361
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-361
Project: Sling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585777#action_12585777
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-361:
-
For the moment I comment the sling/sample
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger closed SLING-362.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in Rev. 644941
JspC plugin should fail on error and support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585792#action_12585792
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-357:
-
Implemented first step (bang separator)
Add support for ResourceBundle base names
-
Key: SLING-363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-363
Project: Sling
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Core
Reporter:
I18N: Apply ResourceResolver.getSearchPath() to prioritized messages with the
same key
--
Key: SLING-364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-364
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger closed SLING-364.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closing this issue after committing the fix. See Subversion Commits for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585815#action_12585815
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-363:
-
Committed the extensions. See Subversion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger closed SLING-363.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Updated the documentation on the site. Thus closing this issue.
Add
57 matches
Mail list logo