their signatures, and build them in the
correct sequence that AFAIK is nowhere defined.
With this release structure I don't think anyone in their right mind
would care to download the sources and build them, and that's IMHO a
bad thing.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
With this release structure I don't think anyone in their right mind
would care to download the sources and build them, and that's IMHO a
bad thing.
Hmm, ok, this depends of course on your
. not just
another build tool) in release management and even changing the
meaning of a release. It'll be interesting to see where such
progress takes us and how well for example the Apache release
practices will cope with this change. :-)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
this a bit extreme?
What's wrong with just tagging the entire trunk and having the release
candidate be the packaged svn export of that tag?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.06.2008, 17:14 +0300 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
I'm trying to understand the issue, do you have an example of a case
where this would be troublesome?
It is not directly troublesome, more like
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.06.2008, 17:31 +0300 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
Anyway, if your component depends for example on log4j 1.2.15, it's
much better to explicitly exclude such transitive dependencies than to
mark
is modified to use a LinkedHashMap internally instead of a
plain HashMap in order to guarantee the order amongst the properties of
JSONObject's.
How serious is this? I.e. how much code we have that depends on a
specific ordering of properties?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting (JIRA) wrote:
Why is the scheduler bundle needed? Can't Sling use Quartz directly?
The scheduler bundle makes scheduling tasks much simpler than directly
using Quartz; it uses Quartz underneath
Hi,
+1 Yes, move the Management Console to Apache Felix
BR,
Jukka Zitting
to put more focus on addressing the
diversity issue. Getting the first release out will probably help.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just have to add in Kermit's words: Applause, Applause, Applause ;-)
+1 Well played, Carsten!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
in light of WebDAV editing, etc.
The important thing is to realize that those are two separate
resources that should be identified and accessed through separate
URIs.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
such a meetup!
[1] http://www.eu.apachecon.com/eu2008/
BR,
Jukka Zitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12576983#action_12576983
]
Jukka Zitting commented on SLING-315:
-
The problem regarding licensing I have
to the test.jsp node?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
webdav in order to get it's content
Or you could use a normal selector. Executing a resource as a script
is just another way of rendering a representation to be sent to the
client.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
,
Jukka Zitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570341#action_12570341
]
Jukka Zitting commented on SLING-251:
-
Ah, I see what you mean.
Is there a use case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569818#action_12569818
]
Jukka Zitting commented on SLING-251:
-
Is this a form of vanity URLs or an answer
? Such information
would be valuable input in making the type registry in Tika more
reusable.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12569879#action_12569879
]
Jukka Zitting commented on SLING-251:
-
Couldn't we solve the same needs much more
benchmark that points out resource
resolution as a bottleneck?
IMHO the added complexity of a cache can only be justified if it gives
a clear and measurable performance benefit and if there are no
architecturally cleaner approaches to solving the bottleneck.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Feb 16, 2008 2:20 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag, den 15.02.2008, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
How about allowing a sling:config child node that could be added to
any node and could contain script and servlet mappings and other
configuration settings
to resolve any issue that
causes...
[1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Jan 18, 2008 4:49 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.01.2008, 16:40 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
On a related note, I don't think jackrabbit-jcr-commons should be
included in the API/Commons bundle. The commons classes are not
something you should
dependency of
jackrabbit-core. All the internal Name and Path handling is done using
functionality from spi-commons.
I don't know OSGi enough to understand why such internal packages need
to be explicitly declared.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
the Jackrabbit repository
bundle, not the API/Commons bundle.
On a related note, I don't think jackrabbit-jcr-commons should be
included in the API/Commons bundle. The commons classes are not
something you should be passing around between bundles.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Jan 17, 2008 8:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will do, got my apache login info yesterday.
You now also have the required karma to commit to incubator/sling.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
line generated RSS or
Atom feeds.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Jan 9, 2008 5:40 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/stuff.json - full recursion
/stuff.1.json - 1 level recursion
etc...
Why not:
/stuff.json?depth=1
It's not like we need to use the URI mapping for everything.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
in theory there should be nothing in query
parameters that would prevent caching.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
that? As a
RESTful web framework, Sling should IMHO have built-in support for
things like ETags, Expiration headers, 304 responses, etc.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Jan 8, 2008 10:13 AM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paddy, welcome to the team!
+1!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
interface
to set other status codes.
+1
...I'm not sure if indicating a redirect back to the error handler makes
sense? I would rather expect that the code sends the redirct status
instead of throwing an exception...
Agreed as well.
+1
BR,
Jukka Zitting
SNAPSHOT.
How about replacing SNAPSHOT with something like STABLE whenever
releasing a component? That way we'd only need to play tricks with the
qualifier part and avoid messing with release numbering.
Just an idea, I'm not opposed to Felix' proposal.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Jan 3, 2008 11:09 AM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 11:39 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
Along those lines, my counter-proposal would be to use special
sling:servlet and sling:filter nodes for configuring and accessing
such resources, sticking
Hi,
What parts of Sling require servlet-api 2.4 and jsp 2.0 over
servlet-api 2.3 and jsp 1.2? How strict are these requirements?
Basically, how hard it would be to make run Sling on a 2.3 servlet
container?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Dec 20, 2007 4:27 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2007, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
PPS. For special circumstances (e.g. GSoC students, temporary
cross-project integration, etc.) it is good to reserve the option of
granting someone
is good.
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Proposal+Apache+Sling+Community+Roles+and+Processes;jsessionid=49FD5C34793AE03A9BACE59FB3781E3D
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
What's the patched Jasper version/revision? It would help if we could
see how extensive the Jasper changes are.
I'm sure Jasper has also some other use cases where it would be useful
to customize how the transpilation results are stored.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
as separators in which case
the current resolution process works pretty much as envisioned.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
make the Sling internals more modular as the ScriptResolver would
essentially become just another Sling servlet component.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Nov 19, 2007 11:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Though, on a tangent, I'm wondering if we could achieve the same use
cases with just the existing URL-to-JCR-path mapping. [...]
The disadvantage is that it makes
.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
the need for the Resource
interface in the first place; why not use Node instead?
PS. I may well be too much of a reductionist with this and the URI
mapping issue. Perhaps I should start writing nanosling. Just
kidding... ;-)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On 11/2/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Hope to see you then in Atlanta
I'll be there as well, arriving late Monday for the Hackathon.
Me too. I'm flying in already on Saturday. See you there!
BR,
Jukka
.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
on the related thread.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
release
* Grow a more diverse community (so far only commits from Day employees)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
Do all committers already have Confluence accounts with enough karma
to edit the wiki? What's the process for setting up the accounts and
giving out the required karma?
Could we set up the wiki to send change notifications to sling-commits?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
repository, but AFAIK that issue was
already resolved. I'll follow up within Day to push for the API jar to
be uploaded to the Maven repository.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
101 - 152 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
