t; I'd rather not receive such notices, and it is filling our mail
> > discussion archives with irrelevant dreck. It should be sent to
> > a notices list instead.
> >
> > Roy
> >
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this at Apache Felix works rather good.
regards,
Karl
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/SLING/
> [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L. If find it way to heavy,
> so using just a string for URI or the URI class (which just operates on
> a string level) might be a better way to go.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ork I could imagine adding it to the Apache Felix
> project. WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> [1] http://www.aqute.biz/Code/FileInstall
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What issues would that be?
regards,
Karl
> --
> Torgeir Veimo
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> > Regards and Thanks
> > Felix
> >
> > [1]
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/sling-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg01331.html
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this level of security enforced. And I have to
> admit, that this is not currently the part of the OSGi specification I
> understand the best ... Maybe Karl Pauls may be able to jump in, if I
> got something completely wrong.
One issue to keep in mind is that for OSGi security to work
elix as well. We did gain some committers this
way. Not sure whether it would make a big difference but I'd be up for
giving it a shot.
regards,
Karl
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/maven
>
> The KEYS file to check my signature is at
> http://people.apache.org/~cziegeler/releases/sling/
>
> This is basically just one big release, so please cast your votes.
>
> Thanks
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ease.
>
> So the first releases would be launchpad-app-1, launchpad-webapp-1 and
> sling-1. As the upcoming release is our third try, we'll start with "3" for
> this to reduce confusion (hopefully). After the release the version will be
> changed to 4-SNAPSHOT.
>
> WDYT?
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e maven repository and get the
>> classpath using
>> "org/scala-lang/scala-library/2.7.1/scala-library-2.7.1.jar".
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm currently confused with this problem. I can write tests for the current
>> code but even though all other code is completed using
>>
>> "Settings.classpath().value_$eq("/home/janandith/.m2/repository/org/scala-lang/scala-library/2.7.1/scala-library-2.7.1.jar");"
>> temporarily it would leave with the same problem of avoiding path setting in
>> the completed project.
>>
>> What are your suggesstions ?. How can I move forward in solving this issue.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/browser/scala/trunk/src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/Interpreter.scala
>> [2]
>> https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/browser/scala/trunk/src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/Settings.scala
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g to learn too much about
> Sling internals.
You might want to have a look at the spring framework:
http://static.springframework.org/osgi/docs/current/reference/html/testing.html#testing:integration
it looks promising but I haven't really found the time to test drive
it myself...
regards,
Karl
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
elease. Jukka? Roy?
>
> (Please note that we're currently waiting for a release of the Felix SCR
> module, the vote period is open but there are only two votes yet...)
I will look at it tonight (i have been away last week).
regards,
Karl
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
we place references in LICENSE, I think we could
> just as well put the entire license texts there.
I think that makes sense - the LICENSE.* files are somewhat none
standard and probably not really supported by downstream tools.
regards,
Karl
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ences to the LICENSE.* files. Roy
>> says they should. If we place references in LICENSE, I think we could
>> just as well put the entire license texts there.
>
> I would go with a reference.
Including the LICENSE.* files and adding references in the LICENSE
file feels a bit strange - it seems easier to just put the entire
license texts there...
regards,
Karl
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Jukka Zitting w
release, so please cast your votes, the vote
> will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
act that we are talking about using rmi I would
assume there must be at least a SecurityManager around no?
Furthermore, is it possible that the Subject (as in java) is used
(directly or indirectly)?
regards,
Karl
> Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
regards,
Karl
2009/5/18 Dominik Süß :
> [X] +1 Graduate as a top level project
> (non-binding)
>
> Best regards
> Dominik
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
19 matches
Mail list logo