On 10/9/07, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I think generally I would be cautious about introducing too much
> abstraction.
>
> In many respects unnecessary abstraction causes software to fail in the
> market.
> I agree with Stefano 100% on this one ...
Ok - I see your point, t
Hi all,
> Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 12:08 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> > Yes, so my proposal is not much different to what we have now, except
> > that, as we see below, Content and Servlets are more decoupled from
> > JCR, mostly by using URIs instead of paths.
>
> I like this (further)
Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 12:08 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Yes, so my proposal is not much different to what we have now, except
> that, as we see below, Content and Servlets are more decoupled from
> JCR, mostly by using URIs instead of paths.
I like this (further) decoupling. This is
On 10/8/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >... The ResourceResolver filter selects the Resource that the current
> > request applies to.
>
> This is currently called the ContentResolver and a Resource is currently
> called Content manifested by an implementation of the Content int
Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 08:58 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> I *think* the model below more or less matches the current resource
> processing model, but makes it a bit more general and less dependent
> on JCR. Making it more generic and more plainly REST-oriented might
> help drive Sling a
On 10/4/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...After the introduction of the topic by Carsten and some initial
> discussion, I created issue SLING-28 [1] and committed a first
> prototype. After having it around for some days now, I want to call for
> a final discussion on this topi
Hi all,
After the introduction of the topic by Carsten and some initial
discussion, I created issue SLING-28 [1] and committed a first
prototype. After having it around for some days now, I want to call for
a final discussion on this topic.
Is there anything, which would go wrong in this directio
