ite-access
limitations, on the other hand, I propose:
We ask for another space on Confluence (moinmoin is not an option to me
and would make migration of documentation more complicated), such as
SlINGWIKI, which would be open to anyone. If time comes, we can migrate
documentation from the open wiki to the
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...I propose:
> We ask for another space on Confluence...
+1, I suggested moinmoin as it didn't occur to me that we could have
two Confluence wikis, but that's obviously better.
> ...such as
> SlINGWIKI...
I'd call it SLINGPU
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...I propose:
> > We ask for another space on Confluence...
>
> +1, I suggested moinmoin as it didn't occur to me that we could have
> two Confluenc
+1
not that this is in any way binding, but it is exactly what I would
have proposed.
Lars
On 23.01.2008, at 09:21, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
.
Cool, when will it be up? I scribbled down two short intros for sling
(one for a general intro like Peter Svensson was probably missing and
one for the REST expert) that are perfect for the wiki because they
need to be finalized and probably corrected by others.
Alex
Am 23.01.2008 um 16:2
+1
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:21:25
To:sling-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Open Wiki
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On Jan 2
igration of documentation more complicated), such as
> SlINGWIKI, which would be open to anyone. If time comes, we can migrate
> documentation from the open wiki to the site-wiki.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
On Jan 23, 2008 9:21 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...I'd call it SLINGPUBLIC to make it clearer what it's about...
Felix, did you request creation this new SLINGPUBLIC wiki space already?
I think we have agree on having it.
-Bertrand
Hi Bertrand,
I just asked for it to be created, have been distracted until now.
Regards
Felix
Am Samstag, den 02.02.2008, 09:50 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On Jan 23, 2008 9:21 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ...I'd call it SLINGPUBLIC to make it clearer what
Hi all,
Just a quick poll ;-)
Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> > ...such as
> > SlINGWIKI...
>
> I'd call it SLINGPUBLIC to make it clearer what it's about.
According to infra@ the convention for Confluence is to have
"SLING" (aka ${project}) as the open/p
On Feb 6, 2008 7:53 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...According to infra@ the convention for Confluence is to have
> "SLING" (aka ${project}) as the open/public wiki and "SLINGxSITE" (aka
> ${project}xSITE) as the autoexported wbesite space.
>
> It this is also ok, because then
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 7:53 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...According to infra@ the convention for Confluence is to have
"SLING" (aka ${project}) as the open/public wiki and "SLINGxSITE" (aka
${project}xSITE) as the autoexported wbesite space.
It this is
Ditto
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:17:01
To:sling-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Open Wiki
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 7:53 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMA
13 matches
Mail list logo
