On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> ...I have no issue with renaming this servlet for clarity sake, but
> SlingWebDavServlet is already taken ;-)...
Ok, thanks for clarifying, hadn't noticed that.
> ...We could really name SlingSimpleWebDavServlet to indicate it works the
Hi,
Bertrand Delacretaz schrieb:
> (still catching up with my Sling mail ;-)
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Marc Speck wrote:
>> ...You have also my vote if you want to rename
>> org.apache.sling.jcr.webdav.impl.servlets.SimpleWebdavServlet. "public class
>> SimpleWebDavServlet ex
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> 2009/3/31 Bertrand Delacretaz
>>> I agree that this can be confusing, do people agree about renaming the
>>> Sling servlet, to SlingSimpleWebDavServlet, maybe?
> ...I'm fine with the name change, but what is really the idea of having a
Paul Noden wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
>> I agree that this can be confusing, do people agree about renaming the
>> Sling servlet, to SlingSimpleWebDavServlet, maybe?
>>
>
> +1
>
I'm fine with the name change, but what is really the idea of having a
"Simple" in the name? Especially
2009/3/31 Bertrand Delacretaz
> I agree that this can be confusing, do people agree about renaming the
> Sling servlet, to SlingSimpleWebDavServlet, maybe?
>
+1
Kind Regards,
Paul Noden
(still catching up with my Sling mail ;-)
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Marc Speck wrote:
> ...You have also my vote if you want to rename
> org.apache.sling.jcr.webdav.impl.servlets.SimpleWebdavServlet. "public class
> SimpleWebDavServlet extends SimpleWebdavServlet" is not very readable
