Re: svn commit: r668162 - /incubator/sling/trunk/servlets/get/pom.xml

2008-06-16 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Thanks and Regards Felix Am Montag, den 16.06.2008, 16:04 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...I am not sure, we should do this just for JST ! Rather we should > > include the renderers as private packages in

Re: svn commit: r668162 - /incubator/sling/trunk/servlets/get/pom.xml

2008-06-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...I am not sure, we should do this just for JST ! Rather we should > include the renderers as private packages into the JST bundle if need > be Ok, I see your point - I'll revert and use the renderers as private p

Re: svn commit: r668162 - /incubator/sling/trunk/servlets/get/pom.xml

2008-06-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bdelacretaz Date: Mon Jun 16 06:54:45 2008 New Revision: 668162 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=668162&view=rev Log: SLING-466 - export the org.apache.sling.servlets.get.helpers package: reusable default renderers Hi, is this really required? I would l

Re: svn commit: r668162 - /incubator/sling/trunk/servlets/get/pom.xml

2008-06-16 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, I am not a fan of this. I did not export the renderes by intent. I am not sure, where we are heading with these and I do not want to burn some API we cannot sustain... And I am not sure, we should do this just for JST ! Rather we should include the renderers as private packages into the JST b