Dear SLUG
I have had a spectacular lack of success with installing Xandros Open
Circulation version 2.01 ( which I got from Lankum, Sydney...lest you
think I stuffed up the download etc... ;-).
My computer is a dual boot HP Brio BA 600 (I think), with a 14 G hard
drive, with Windows 98 SE on
DistroWatch.com was the first to report that a complete, bootable, and
installable ISO image of SUSE LINUX 9.1 Personal has appeared on SUSE's ftp
server and its mirrors. No public announcement on SUSE's website is available
yet. This is the first time ever that SUSE makes an ISO for i386 of
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 23:00 -0800, SL wrote:
So, I can't instal Xandros (supposedly dead easy), but I can instal
Mandrake or Red Hat. I am able to instal Windows as well. I think Mt
Gates would say there is an obvious answer to my problems ;-)
I can only guess since I've never used
Hi!
I just read that you might have a rprint (equinox terminal server) tar
file?? (source code)
We are connecting an equinox terminal server up to an x86 solaris platform,
but unfortunately I've lost the source files, is there any chance that you
could send us if you got'em???
Thanx /Wojtek
--
Hi
I used to use lilo quite happily, but now have to use grub since lilo
is not in Fedora. There seems to be a lack of doco in changing up
grub.conf - at least, I can't seem to get it right. So, in
/usr/src/linux, I run make, copy bzImage to /boot, run make
modules_install and then modify
Jan Newmarch said:
Hi
I used to use lilo quite happily, but now have to use grub since lilo
is not in Fedora. There seems to be a lack of doco in changing up
grub.conf - at least, I can't seem to get it right. So, in
/usr/src/linux, I run make, copy bzImage to /boot, run make
modules_install and
forgot to CC the list.
Forwarded Message
From: James Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan Newmarch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] grub.conf: rebuilding kernel blues
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:42 +1000
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 22:00 +1000, Jan Newmarch wrote:
Hi
I used to
Since you have previously installed Mandrake, I suggest that you boot with
the Mandrake CD and select CUstom Install. As part of the install process
you will then be able to use DiskDrake to partition your hard drive.
Delete the existing Mandrake partitions then exit the install process.
Then
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:25:00AM +1000, Harald Richard Ashburner wrote:
Hi Jan,
Rather than copying bzImage around the place how about
make make modules_install make install
or
make help
to see the full list of options, which from memory you can make an rpm
package which you can then
PROTECTED]
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.slug.org.au/archives/slug/attachments/20040623/9a9fe165/attachment.bin
On Thu Mar 18, 2004 at 13:32:50 +1100, Benno wrote:
Sorry this is probably a dumb question, but what is the
arch way of reverting a file back to its latest copy.
In cvs I do:
rm foo; cvs up foo
Following up my own question...
The answer is that tla can't do this. The easiest way I've
found it
On Thu Jun 24, 2004 at 10:38:37 +1000, Gavin Carr wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:27:59AM +1000, Benno wrote:
On Thu Mar 18, 2004 at 13:32:50 +1100, Benno wrote:
Sorry this is probably a dumb question, but what is the
arch way of reverting a file back to its latest copy.
In cvs I do:
I've managed to solve this (details of original problem below solution).
When upgrading from RedHat 9.0 to Fedora Core 2, there is a change made to /etc/X11/XF86Config. I don't know whether it changed with Core 1 or 2, as I skipped Core 1.
in the section Input Device there is a line,
Option
I have taken the latest steps suggested by James Gregory, as I will outline
below (in case others experience similar difficulties) and they were
unsuccessful. However, in the meantime I managed to suceed on my second
front, so I won't be pursuing this further - see my posting RedHat 9.0/Linux
What systems are available these days for archival storage of info.
Optical storage is not really archival.
Kind regards
Kevin
--
__
(_ \
_) )
| / / _ ) / _ | / ___) / _ )
| | ( (/
Kevin Waterson wrote:
What systems are available these days for archival storage of info.
Optical storage is not really archival.
It depends on how far back you define archival. By my definition of
archival there is no digital archival medium. Archival to me means being
able to store information
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 01:29:57PM +1000, Michael Lake wrote:
Kevin Waterson wrote:
What systems are available these days for archival storage of info.
Optical storage is not really archival.
It depends on how far back you define archival. By my definition of
archival there is no digital
Alexander Samad wrote:
..snip
Basically looking back from the future our age will be an age that
archivists may call The information dark age - not because we were
un-enlightened but because the information never lasted.
What about punch cards!
Hmm, guess who has never had the job
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:33:29PM +1000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
What systems are available these days for archival storage of info.
Optical storage is not really archival.
foolishness
Wax cylinders rock for audio - there are recordings from the Torres
Strait in 1898 still around.
/foolishness
We (Aristocrat) have recently celebrated our 50th anniversary, and some
items of interest were archived such as old engineering designs. The
material that has lasted so far has included film drawings (onto
polycarbonate film with black latex-based ink), and some paper drawings that
were stored
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:09:08PM +1000, Terry Collins wrote:
Alexander Samad wrote:
..snip
Basically looking back from the future our age will be an age that
archivists may call The information dark age - not because we were
un-enlightened but because the information never
21 matches
Mail list logo
