[SLUG] Re: Cyrus

2005-03-01 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:14:14PM +1100, Matthew Davidson wrote: > I have set up /etc/imapd.conf for virtual domains with a global admin > user as per the docs. However, when I try to set up a mailbox > associated with a particular domain thus: > > # saslpasswd2 -c [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # cyradm

Re: [SLUG] PCMCIA 802.11g recommendations

2005-03-01 Thread Rocci
James Gray wrote: Hi All, Yes I've STFW, Googled and checked the archives. I'm going to be upgrading my PCMCIA card on my lappy to support 802.11g (and possibly 802.11a + WPA) [1]. So far my search has yielded to potential candidates: Linksys WPC55AG [2] Netgear WG511U [3] I know to get either o

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread amos
So the situation you are describing is that you have a "critical" server on Linux that you want to be able to switch over to Windows if you screw up its setup? If that's the case then how about actually having another image of Linux on another partition and boot to it if you screw up the "primary"

Re: [SLUG] Cyrus

2005-03-01 Thread O Plameras
Matthew Davidson wrote: Hi All, Since it's been adopted as the standard IMAP server for UserLinux, I thought I'd check out Cyrus (on Debian Sarge). I am finding the documentation more unfriendly than is usual for free software (which is saying something), and third-party documentation rather th

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread Rod Butcher
Apache runs as uid & gid 72, so I changed fstab to :- /dev/hdh1 /Win2k vfat defaults,umask=002,uid=72,gid=72 0 0 and remounted /Win2k. Still no dice, Apache wouldn't read it. ??? I added apache to root user group (yeah, I know... just as a test) but still didn't work - I thought that if apache was

Re: [SLUG] Decrypting GPG/PGP in email body with Evolution

2005-03-01 Thread Simon Wong
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 08:51 +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: > Even though I have gnupg installed and enabled in Evolution, I am not > getting the encrypted block decrypted, neither is the attachment > showing, though the MIME boundaries look OK. Do you have the sender's public key imported into GnuPG

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread Shaun Butler
Phil Scarratt wrote: Michael Lake wrote: Rod Butcher wrote: Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot using nautilus and changing the conf files. Apache now returns "You don't have permission to

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread Phil Scarratt
Michael Lake wrote: Rod Butcher wrote: Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot using nautilus and changing the conf files. Apache now returns "You don't have permission to access /bookmarks.ht

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread James Gregory
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:03 +1100, Rod Butcher wrote: > Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office > from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot > using nautilus and changing the conf files. Apache now returns "You > don't have permission

[SLUG] Cyrus

2005-03-01 Thread Matthew Davidson
Hi All, Since it's been adopted as the standard IMAP server for UserLinux, I thought I'd check out Cyrus (on Debian Sarge). I am finding the documentation more unfriendly than is usual for free software (which is saying something), and third-party documentation rather thin on the ground. I am

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Lake
Rod Butcher wrote: Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot using nautilus and changing the conf files. Apache now returns "You don't have permission to access /bookmarks.htm on this server" to

Re: [SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Fox
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:03:41 +1100, Rod Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office > from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot > using nautilus and changing the conf files. Apache now returns "You > don'

[SLUG] security different on vfat compared to ext ?

2005-03-01 Thread Rod Butcher
Hello sluggers, I've moved an Apache intranet I run on my home office from an ext3 to a vfat partition. I did this by copying the DocumentRoot using nautilus and changing the conf files. Apache now returns "You don't have permission to access /bookmarks.htm on this server" to the browser. I do

Re: [SLUG] USB Wireless Dongles

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Fox
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:12:09 +1100, Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as I can see there are not many g cards supported by Linux. I > run wireless using a DLink wireless PCMCIA card, using ndiswrapper and > dlink windows drivers. I still cant get g support. Isn't OSX bsd > based? What

Re: [SLUG] USB Wireless Dongles

2005-03-01 Thread Kevin Saenz
As far as I can see there are not many g cards supported by Linux. I run wireless using a DLink wireless PCMCIA card, using ndiswrapper and dlink windows drivers. I still cant get g support. Isn't OSX bsd based? What was wrong with it? > > I think airport extreme is not supported under Linux lik

Re: [SLUG] Memory-mapping source files for faster lexical analysis

2005-03-01 Thread Glen Turner
Michael Knight wrote: I'm starting an honours year at uni this year. My supervisor and I are thinking of doing a paper on trying to determine if memory-mapping source files will speed up the lexical analysis phase of various compilers (instead of whatever buffering method it currently employs). The

Re: [SLUG] USB Wireless Dongles

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Fox
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:39:03 +1100, Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think airport extreme is not supported under Linux like most 802.11g > cards (except for prisim or orinoco) you are going to find it > difficult to get 11g running on your laptop. I believe Kevin is right Chris. I've not

Re: [SLUG] USB Wireless Dongles

2005-03-01 Thread Kevin Saenz
I think airport extreme is not supported under Linux like most 802.11g cards (except for prisim or orinoco) you are going to find it difficult to get 11g running on your laptop. > 'morning SLUGers, > > I have an iBook G4 which, on the weekend, at the codefest, nuked OSX > from in turn for ubuntu

[SLUG] USB Wireless Dongles

2005-03-01 Thread Chris Deigan
'morning SLUGers, I have an iBook G4 which, on the weekend, at the codefest, nuked OSX from in turn for ubuntu. Everything works so far except sleep (which I'm going to look at) and the internal wireless (Airport Extreme). Any support for airport extreme looks sucky, so I want to get a USB wirele

[SLUG] $B!V5$;}$A%$%$%C!*!W$H46$8$^$/$j!*(B

2005-03-01 Thread 初々しく淡いオマ○コ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ¡¡-™ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@‘f‘«Eƒpƒ“ƒXƒgEƒnƒCƒq[ƒ‹ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@`‚ß‚­‚é‚ß‚­ƒtƒFƒ`‰æ‘œE“®‰æ‚Ì•óŒÉ`-

Re: [SLUG] Memory-mapping source files for faster lexical analysis

2005-03-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 23:51 +1100, Benno wrote: >This sounds interesting but I would have thought that it was as much >an operating systems thing as a languages compilers thing. IO-Lite is a related work for this. >One thing to watch out for is that this is likely to be OS dependant; >how the IO

Re: [SLUG] Memory-mapping source files for faster lexical analysis

2005-03-01 Thread Benno
On Tue Mar 01, 2005 at 23:02:59 +1100, Michael Knight wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm starting an honours year at uni this year. My supervisor and I are >thinking of doing a paper on trying to determine if memory-mapping >source files will speed up the lexical analysis phase of various >compilers (instead o

Re: [SLUG] Memory-mapping source files for faster lexical analysis

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Knight
QuantumG wrote: > May I ask who your supervisor is (and at what university?) Sure, my supervisor is Tony Sloane and we're at Macquarie University. > If you're interested in "unique" uses for compiler technology, you might > my open source project interesting: > >http://boomerang.sou

Re: [SLUG] Memory-mapping source files for faster lexical analysis

2005-03-01 Thread QuantumG
Michael Knight wrote: Hi all, I'm starting an honours year at uni this year. My supervisor and I are thinking of doing a paper on trying to determine if memory-mapping source files will speed up the lexical analysis phase of various compilers (instead of whatever buffering method it currently emplo

[SLUG] Memory-mapping source files for faster lexical analysis

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Knight
Hi all, I'm starting an honours year at uni this year. My supervisor and I are thinking of doing a paper on trying to determine if memory-mapping source files will speed up the lexical analysis phase of various compilers (instead of whatever buffering method it currently employs). While we can't

Re: [SLUG] Re: Weird login behaviour

2005-03-01 Thread Ken Foskey
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 11:31 +1000, QuantumG wrote: > The C language is just so full of pitfalls and traps that it is next to > impossible to write secure code in it. You can do it obviously (look at > OpenBSD) but it requires so much discipline and arcane knowledge that > most programmers simp

[SLUG] Re: CTAN font packages & debian TeX

2005-03-01 Thread Nick Croft
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello TeX experts > > I've been attempting to add (CTAN) fonts packages to my TeX installation, > meticulously following the advice given in > http://www.ctan.org/installationadvice > > I actually downloaded and unpa

[SLUG] PCMCIA 802.11g recommendations

2005-03-01 Thread James Gray
Hi All, Yes I've STFW, Googled and checked the archives. I'm going to be upgrading my PCMCIA card on my lappy to support 802.11g (and possibly 802.11a + WPA) [1]. So far my search has yielded to potential candidates: Linksys WPC55AG [2] Netgear WG511U [3] I know to get either of these working