Fyi,
Adam.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/27/schneier_infosec/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
I'm wondering how they plan to do that? Are they going to encrypt the
MBR? I think this is FUD from microsoft again. They are planning on
encrypting the drive that windows resides on. I don't know if it's going
to effect the MBR, or all partitions on the harddrive.
Apparently they are planning
On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:09:25 +1000, Kevin Saenz wrote:
>I'm wondering how they plan to do that? Are they going to encrypt the
>MBR? I think this is FUD from microsoft again. They are planning on
>encrypting the drive that windows resides on. I don't know if it's going
>to effect the MBR, or a
On Friday 28 April 2006 19:55, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/27/schneier_infosec/
Call me cynical (or stupid), but software cannot offer hardware based
encryption. Sure, a piece of software can make use of hardware based
features, as can other pieces of software.
(
There is an indepth article that states that it will be impossible to
install linux on a machine that has vista on it.
I'm wondering how they plan to do that? Are they going to encrypt the
MBR? I think this is FUD from microsoft again. They are planning on
encrypting the drive that windows re
also the article states
This encryption technology also has the effect of frustrating the
exchange of data needed in a dual boot system. "You could look at
BitLocker as anti-Linux because it frustrates dual boot," Schneier told
El Reg.
On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:09:25 +1000, Kevin Saenz wrote:
On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:42:59 +1000, Kevin Saenz wrote:
>also the article states
>
>This encryption technology also has the effect of frustrating the
>exchange of data needed in a dual boot system. "You could look at
>BitLocker as anti-Linux because it frustrates dual boot," Schneier told
>El
On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:18:15 +1000, Malcolm V wrote:
>On Friday 28 April 2006 19:55, Adam Bogacki wrote:
>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/27/schneier_infosec/
>
>Call me cynical (or stupid), but software cannot offer hardware based
>encryption. Sure, a piece of software can make use of
On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:39:36 +1000, Kevin Saenz wrote:
>There is an indepth article that states that it will be impossible to
>install linux on a machine that has vista on it.
Where? This seems like FUD.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/security/bittech.mspx
talks about lock the
and how is this any different to dual booting currently with NTFS and Linux? most people who dual boot have a FAT32 partition to share data, just a big hullabaloo about nothing...yawn :)
On 4/27/06, Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fyi,Adam.http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/27/schneier_in
G'day Mark,
"Mark Sargent".quote;
>my name is Mark Sargent and I'll be in attendace tonight for the first
>time. I've been a Linux user for about 1.5yrs now(although I'm coming to
>you from an XP box(ouch!))
Welcome aboard!
Hope you enjoyed tonight, and that we'll see you at our future events.
Need money?
Your credit doesn't matter to us!
Want IMMEDIATE cash to spend ANY way you like, or simply wish
to LOWER your monthly payments by a third or more?
Simply fill out this one-minute form...
http://LWozHwaFhbCSsx.babycareadvisor.com
acme screw thread dry-eared brush bronzewing
serrate-den
Hi
X d A m N b A o X b
V h A m L l I a U c M s
C t I q A o L h I z S j
V y I x A f G q R w A a
http://www.breitenort.com
ovatio
maidservan
excommunicat
busil
recreat
Hows it going? interrupted Conklin.Were doing our own cross-pollinating between the Sicilians and a number of E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With regards to last night's Slug meeting and using automated testing,
I think everyone agrees that writing (and using) test cases produces
higher quality code with less bugs. My point is that higher quality
output doesn't come for free, it requires e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benno:
> On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:18:15 +1000, Malcolm V wrote:
> >On Friday 28 April 2006 19:55, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/27/schneier_infosec/
> >
> >Call me cynical (or stupid), but software cannot offer hard
On Sat, April 29, 2006 14:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Benno:
>> On Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 20:18:15 +1000, Malcolm V wrote:
>> >On Friday 28 April 2006 19:55, Adam Bogacki wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/27/schneier_infosec/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> With regards to last night's Slug meeting and using automated testing,
> I think everyone agrees that writing (and using) test cases produces
> higher quality code with less bugs. My point is that higher quality
> out
Hi all,
So basically, after a bit of confusion, I've been asked to forward a Google
invitation for anyone (men, women, other :) to attend the Sydney Google
office launch.
http://www.google.com.au/events/openhouse.html
In the spirit of keeping everyone informed, now you all know :)
Carl from Goo
18 matches
Mail list logo
