I know there are some Nagios users out there so this one's for you.
How do you change a scheduled downtime period once you have scheduled
it?
I made the mistake of making some downtime too long but I can't find
where to change the time frame.
I don't want to have to delete the entry as I should
On 11 Jul 2006, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Is there a way to tell the Nautilus file manager to fsck disks before
> > mounting them?
> >
> > Is there a way to get nautilus to insert "Check Volume" in the same menu
> > as it displays "Mount Volume" for unmounted disks?
> >
> >
Hi Dean,
--- Dean Hamstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why do ARM and other embedded
> type
> architectures still use kernel 2.4 series?
Its easier to continue to use 2.4 for time-to-market
reasons.
I use AT91RM9200 and ARM926EJ-S at work, and we have
migrated to 2.6.
AR
> Is there a way to tell the Nautilus file manager to fsck disks before
> mounting them?
>
> Is there a way to get nautilus to insert "Check Volume" in the same menu
> as it displays "Mount Volume" for unmounted disks?
>
> This is in the context of external USB HDD enclosures.
No, but they sou
Is there a way to tell the Nautilus file manager to fsck disks before
mounting them?
Is there a way to get nautilus to insert "Check Volume" in the same menu
as it displays "Mount Volume" for unmounted disks?
This is in the context of external USB HDD enclosures.
--
Regards
Peter Miller <[EMAIL
G'day everyone,
This is a final reminder that OSDC papers are due tomorrow. Our conference is
nothing without speakers, so I encourage you all to get your proposals in as
soon as possible!
http://www.osdc.com.au/papers/cfp06.html
For those who've never submitted a proposal before, or sp
Hi
is anybody able to though more light:
To rebuild my kernel (its a long story ...) I do:
apt-get source linux-image-2.6.15-25-686
apt-get build-dep linux-image-2.6.15-25-686
unpack /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.15.tar.bz2
link linux to linux-source-2.6.15
copy /boot/config-2.6.15-25-686 to .config
On 7/11/06, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, why do ARM and other embedded type architectures
> > still use kernel 2.4 series?
> Not all do - the 770 uses 2.6.12.
(And they actually upgraded the kernel for the new firmware - 2.6.16!)
I have a Sharp Zaurus C30
Christopher Vance wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:31:16AM +1000, Simon Wong wrote:
The biggest problem I have come across looking at these is finding
something with 3 NICs without spending a fortune on a multiple interface
card from Intel.
The soekris and pc-engines wrap both have 3 NICs, an
> > Just out of curiosity, why do ARM and other embedded type architectures
> > still use kernel 2.4 series?
> Not all do - the 770 uses 2.6.12.
(And they actually upgraded the kernel for the new firmware - 2.6.16!)
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.lin
ahh yes custom patches.
which could be a big reason for embedded apps with funky proprietary
hardwares.
good thinking. i thought that perhaps some memory algorithm hadn't been
ported (or worse)
Dean
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why do ARM and other embedded type architectures
> Just out of curiosity, why do ARM and other embedded type architectures
> still use kernel 2.4 series?
>
> Verbose technical information is fine ;)
Not all do - the 770 uses 2.6.12. I know some very small systems still use
2.4 due to kernel size (though that is changing with all the nice embe
Just out of curiosity, why do ARM and other embedded type
architectures still use kernel 2.4 series?
Verbose technical information is fine ;)
Dean
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 01:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 2. Small form factor pc with some sort of solid state memory running
> > linux.
>
> I'm doing this at home. I'm running a cut-down ubuntu dapper
> installation, initially installed as a breezy server then any packages I
> didn't need remo
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:31:16AM +1000, Simon Wong wrote:
The biggest problem I have come across looking at these is finding
something with 3 NICs without spending a fortune on a multiple interface
card from Intel.
The soekris and pc-engines wrap both have 3 NICs, and are available
from Yawar
On Wed, July 5, 2006 1:06 am, Chris Deigan wrote:
> SLUG's workshop will be a be a fusion of traditional SLUG events -
> consisting of a codefest, videofest, installfest and for the first time at
> SLUG, a "deckfest".
many thanks to you and SLUG for the help with Centos CDs
--
Voytek
--
SLUG
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:45:36PM +0200, Ben Buxton wrote:
> Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing:
> > On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 10:02 +0200, Ben Buxton wrote:
> > > I've just installed an Asus device running OpenWRT to replace my home
> > > gateway box, and I'm very impressed.
>
> I'm going to have to go back to Mandriva, as my network atleast worked
> under that distro. Now under Ubuntu i cannot see a single wireless
> network. Nothing seems to show why it can't see a network. It is very
> frustrating. At work i'm having to boot into windows and run Linux under
> VM
> I'm after opinions on the following two options in terms of a straight
> firewall. Since I have never used OpenWRT devices before I don't have any
> idea how they rate against a full pc running as a firewall.
> The only caveat is that it (the fw) has to allow for a DMZ, and may have
> to run m
Glen Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing:
>
> The DMZ might be a problem for the WRT54GL since they only
> have three routable interfaces (wireless, "Internet" and
> "LAN"). I don't think that the four 100Base-TX ports are
> independently routable.
>
They certainly are. Depen
Phil Scarratt wrote:
Hi
I'm after opinions on the following two options in terms of a straight
firewall. Since I have never used OpenWRT devices before I don't have
any idea how they rate against a full pc running as a firewall. The
options are:
1. OpenWRT on a Linksys device
2. Small form
Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing:
> On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 10:02 +0200, Ben Buxton wrote:
> > I've just installed an Asus device running OpenWRT to replace my home
> > gateway box, and I'm very impressed.
>
> Which device did you use Ben?
>
> I've been wanting to try this
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 17:45 +1000, Phil Scarratt wrote:
> 2. Small form factor pc with some sort of solid state memory running linux.
The biggest problem I have come across looking at these is finding
something with 3 NICs without spending a fortune on a multiple interface
card from Intel.
Anothe
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 10:02 +0200, Ben Buxton wrote:
> I've just installed an Asus device running OpenWRT to replace my home
> gateway box, and I'm very impressed.
Which device did you use Ben?
I've been wanting to try this out with the WRT54G but could only
purchase a newer version (v5) than was
Jeff,I'm going to have to go back to Mandriva, as my network atleast worked under that distro. Now under Ubuntu i cannot see a single wireless network. Nothing seems to show why it can't see a network. It is very frustrating. At work i'm having to boot into windows and run Linux under VMWARE.
Ve
Jeff,I'm going to have to go back to Mandriva, as my network atleast worked under that distro. Now under Ubuntu i cannot see a single wireless network. Nothing seems to show why it can't see a network. It is very frustrating. At work i'm having to boot into windows and run Linux under VMWARE.
Ve
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:32:43PM +1000, Alan L Tyree wrote:
> I try to keep the really dumb questions on chat.
There is no such thing as a dumb question :-)
There are however off-topic questions
Matt
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription inf
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:19:02PM +1000, Michael Chesterton wrote:
Sounds like network manager would be ideal. There has been some
discussion here about it if you want to search the archives.
I'll try it when I next have access to the machine. Ta.
--
Christopher Vance
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:45:51 +1000, Phil Scarratt wrote:
> 2. Small form factor pc with some sort of solid state memory running linux.
I'm doing this at home. I'm running a cut-down ubuntu dapper
installation, initially installed as a breezy server then any packages I
didn't need removed, fo
Phil Scarratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered the following thing:
> Hi
>
> 1. OpenWRT on a Linksys device
> 2. Small form factor pc with some sort of solid state memory running linux.
>
> The only caveat is that it (the fw) has to allow for a DMZ, and may have
> to run multiple internet (WAN) conne
Hi
I'm after opinions on the following two options in terms of a straight
firewall. Since I have never used OpenWRT devices before I don't have
any idea how they rate against a full pc running as a firewall. The
options are:
1. OpenWRT on a Linksys device
2. Small form factor pc with some so
Christopher Vance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a machine running Dapper with two interfaces, one wired, one
> wireless.
Sounds like network manager would be ideal. There has been some
discussion here about it if you want to search the archives.
from memory you want to
apt-get install n
32 matches
Mail list logo
