Re: Re: [SLUG] Boot problem

2008-03-17 Thread jam
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 00:23:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Try the super grub disk if you can get a copy. It should let you boot > the system. > > Heracles > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | I have LinuxMint KDE 4.0.44 installed > | > | My system has suddenly decided not to boot, giving the followi

Re: [SLUG] Getting printer to print in black only

2008-03-17 Thread ken Foskey
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 01:22 -0700, Leslie Katz wrote: > The printer's a Canon Pixma MP160. > > It has a black cartridge and a colour cartridge. Both must be present for the > printer to work. > > The person for whom I've set the printer up (using Canon-supplied software) > wants to use the prin

[SLUG] AsteriskNow anyone?

2008-03-17 Thread Nigel Allen
Hi Am trying the forums but thought there might be a lurker here. I've got a voip service with our ISP, iinet, working fine when we are going out direct from our LAN through an X-Lite client. Tried to add it as a trunk with AsteriskNow (which is working great extension to extension) and am g

Re: [SLUG] Citrix client fails to open app

2008-03-17 Thread ken Foskey
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 09:20 +0900, Kevin Shackleton wrote: > I have tried installing the Citrix ICA client versions 7, 9 and 10.6 in > Debian Etch, but for each of these the web access page still tells me I > need to install the client. I can log on but if I start an app I get a > timeout in openi

Re: [SLUG] which process holding port

2008-03-17 Thread Hasnain
Sorry for being late guys but thanks heaps for those replies. I cant believe i also forgot lsof or fuser. i didnt know the netstat -p switch. Thank you so much guys you guys are awesome. On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Peter Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:58 +0900, H

Re: [SLUG] which process holding port

2008-03-17 Thread Peter Hardy
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:58 +0900, Hasnain wrote: > Is there anyway how to find which process is holding a tcp port in linux? > Say for instance, i checked > > netstat -a |grep ###. but i dont know which process has opened or hold that > port currently. Is there anyway to find out this? Nobody ha

Re: [SLUG] which process holding port

2008-03-17 Thread David P
Try netstat's "-p" option. David On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Hasnain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Is there anyway how to find which process is holding a tcp port in linux? > Say for instance, i checked > > netstat -a |grep ###. but i dont know which process has opened or

Re: [SLUG] which process holding port

2008-03-17 Thread Mick Pollard
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:58:34 +0900 Hasnain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Is there anyway how to find which process is holding a tcp port in linux? > Say for instance, i checked > > netstat -a |grep ###. but i dont know which process has opened or hold that > port currently. Is th

Re: [SLUG] which process holding port

2008-03-17 Thread David Gillies
Hasnain wrote: > Is there anyway how to find which process is holding a tcp port in linux? > Say for instance, i checked > > netstat -a |grep ###. but i dont know which process has opened or hold that > port currently. Is there anyway to find out this? Hasnain, You'll be wanting the -p switch an

[SLUG] which process holding port

2008-03-17 Thread Hasnain
Hi Everyone, Is there anyway how to find which process is holding a tcp port in linux? Say for instance, i checked netstat -a |grep ###. but i dont know which process has opened or hold that port currently. Is there anyway to find out this? Thanks in advance, Hasnain -- SLUG - Sydney Linux Us

Re: [SLUG] [ot] cheap sms?

2008-03-17 Thread Amos Shapira
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:41 AM, jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You get a NAT'd address, can't even remember what it was. I want to say a > 192 > but that would be dumb. As long as it's not "real" address, no-ip/dyndns are not relevant anyway and the only practical solution I can think of is,