All messages being moderated (Re: [SLUG] inbound email checking)

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008, Phil Scarratt wrote: > Can we try changing the subject of this thread? All messages are being > moderated. The thread Voytek started is to do with a specific error he got sending a mail from a particular address to a particular mail server. It doesn't have anything to do with

Re: [SLUG] inbound email checking

Peter Hardy wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:10 +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Voytek Eymont wrote: >>> is there any req on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending >>> emails as such ? >>> >>> (i.e., who misconfigured their server ?) >> Sender address verification is a

Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound

"Voytek Eymont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the > default web user] (which perhaps I should change, but it never really > caused problems in the past) > > now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces > emails, cla

Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008, Peter Hardy wrote: > I for one think it's perfectly cromulent. If the sender MX utilises > greylisting then it'll send back a transient failure message as distinct > from a permanent 550 failure. At that point, the receiving MX can either > assume a transient failure means it'

Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:10 +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Voytek Eymont wrote: > > is there any req on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending > > emails as such ? > > > > (i.e., who misconfigured their server ?) > > Sender address verification is a fairly common anti-

Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/07/2008 07:15:47 AM: > I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default > web user] (which perhaps I should change, but it never really caused > problems in the past) > > now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emai

[SLUG] :o)

Hola, -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Non Acceptance

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008, David Liell wrote: >Would the Mediator of this group please explain why none of my requests >are accepted. Am I doing something wrong? This mail came through with a bunch of others, which suggests that the list moderators were behind on approving mail. As for why the

Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Voytek Eymont wrote: > is there any req on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending > emails as such ? > > (i.e., who misconfigured their server ?) Sender address verification is a fairly common anti-spam technique. RFC 2821 allows for mail to be rejected based on local

[SLUG] Non Acceptance

Would the Mediator of this group please explain why none of my requests are accepted. Am I doing something wrong? David -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

[SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound

I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default web user] (which perhaps I should change, but it never really caused problems in the past) now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails, claiming my server is mis-configured: is there any req on

[SLUG] Re: 31st July: SyPy Presentation: GAE demo with converting sql to datastore

Hi, Due to limited space please RSVP either via this facebook event or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your name. On Jul 25, 12:42 pm, Dylan Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Python People, > > Next Thursday (31st July) is our mo

[SLUG] SyPy Presentation: GAE demo with converting sql to datastore

Hi Python people, Next Thursday (31st July) is our monthly SyPy meetup (if we drink for long enough after the presentation it will be the first Thursday) There will be a presentation by Brett Morgan on "a demonstration of building a basic google app engine application with a discussion of the dif

[SLUG] MythTV and Ubuntu Hardy

Has anyone got this up and going yet? David -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

[SLUG] Re: Opinions pls on best/easiest setup Groupware suite.

> In short, I guess what I'm really looking for is something to set up > shared calendars, event/meeting invites and tasks for a single domain. Invite processing is really a feature of the client/UI. > So maybe, I don't really needgroupware, but simply a shared calendar > resource (accessible ove

[SLUG] Re: Safe samba configuration

> [global] > domain master = no > local master = no > preferred master = no > os level = 0 > its also a good idea to set up a wins server, and send its details out > using dhcp and set the client mode to wins only. Setting up a WINS server is easy; just set "wins support = yes". That's it! Easy.

Re: [SLUG] The positively latest.

*wget -q http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt/387EE263.gpg -O- | sudo apt-key add - **sudo wget http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt/sources.list.d/hardy.list -O /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq.list *Then just run *sudo aptitude update* and *sudo aptitude install wine* Masood On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at

[SLUG] The positively latest.

I'm using Hardy Heron on a laptop. apt-get install wine results in the installation of wine version 1.0 I have been told that the latest version, 1.1.2, is the one to have if I want to use a certain application. Is there a command like apt get go-to-wine-homepage, get version 1.1.2 and install