[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]]

2006-03-28 Thread Phill O'Flynn
s looking for a better solution. Phill Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]] From:"Ken Foskey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date:Tue, March 2

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-28 Thread Ken Foskey
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:14 +1100, Phill O'Flynn wrote: > > > Thanks guys, > > I guess there is no real way to set default > permissions in a shared folder for new folders and files (apart from using > samba as matt suggested). Is that right? Look at the set uid and gid bit on the directory it

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Benno
On Tue Mar 28, 2006 at 13:14:06 +1100, Phill O'Flynn wrote: > > > >Thanks guys, > >I guess there is no real way to set default >permissions in a shared folder for new folders and files (apart from using >samba as matt suggested). Is that right? > There is also POSIX ACLs, which are kind of cool.

[Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Phill O'Flynn
Thanks guys, I guess there is no real way to set default permissions in a shared folder for new folders and files (apart from using samba as matt suggested). Is that right? Phill Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:51:58 +1100 (EST), Phill O'Flynn uttered > I am aware that existing files are not affected. > > One thing I found in my playing around that if i set the umask in > a console window any files or dirs created after (in that window) have the > permissions i expect. However if i

[Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Phill O'Flynn
,  the file permissions are set differently is this normal Phill Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]] From: "Matthew Hannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, March 28, 2006 9:53 am To

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:39:14PM +1100, Phill O'Flynn wrote: > > > Matt > I don't get it. One web site puts it like this >   >    " The umask command is used to set and determine the > default file creation permissions   on the system" > > which is what i want but it doesn't seem to happen. H

[Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Phill O'Flynn
r if i use samba or linux locally or remotely Phill Original Message ------------ Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions] From:"Matthew Hannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date:Mon, March 27, 2006 3:24 pm To: "Ph

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]]

2006-03-27 Thread Phill O'Flynn
Yes in part. I use samba to read/write whereas a co-worker uses winscp from a remote location.RegardsPhill Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]From:"Matthew Hannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]

2006-03-26 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:00:23PM +1100, Phill O'Flynn wrote: > Basically, all i am trying to do is to set the file permissions of any new > file/sub directory directory created in a shared directory so that the Wait a minute. By shared do you mean shared with samba? If so, yes, you can force ce

Re: [Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]

2006-03-26 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:00:23PM +1100, Phill O'Flynn wrote: > > Basically, all i am trying to do is to set the file permissions of any new > file/sub directory directory created in a shared directory so that the > owner and group had full read/write access by default and others had no > access.

[Fwd: Re: [SLUG] file permissions]

2006-03-26 Thread Phill O'Flynn
Basically, all i am trying to do is to set the file permissions of any new file/sub directory directory created in a shared directory so that the owner and group had full read/write access by default and others had no access. I was under the impression that umask did this Phill ---