Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

On Wed, May 31, 2006 11:01 am, Peter Chubb wrote: SLUG == SLUG feeding spam to the world [EMAIL PROTECTED] SLUG Peter Chubb wrote: SLUG Expecting Joe Average to disect headers is like waiting for SLUG santa clause to bring you a new computer. not sure about santa, but, if you get up before

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

On Wed, May 31, 2006 11:01 am, Peter Chubb wrote: SLUG == SLUG feeding spam to the world [EMAIL PROTECTED] SLUG Peter Chubb wrote: For the rest of us, just send the spam, headers and all, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I just tried... picked up a whole swag of NAB phising emails, and, fwded to

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

I was writing a script to send automatically the contents of my spam mbox to ACMA when I noticed that I *might* have been digging a hole for SLUG. After manually consigning all the incoming spam to my spam box I then ran my shell script as a test, sending the offending emails to me and not

[SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

It looks as thought the ACMA has finally got some teeth and is doing something about spam ... but it also looks as if their website is woefully underpowered to cope with the demand (I've been watching Firefox's little progress indicator for 15 minutes now on the signup/submit spam page) See

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

Peter Chubb wrote: It looks as thought the ACMA has finally got some teeth and is doing something about spam ... I wonder what they can do to stop the chinese, japanese, korean, taiwanese and russian spam that i seem to get by the bucket load. Erik --

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

Peter Chubb wrote: It looks as thought the ACMA has finally got some teeth and is doing something about spam ... but it also looks as if their website is Yer, website! That was when I decided that they were not serious about doing anything about spam. Now, if they had setup a Spamcop type

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

Erik == Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Erik Peter Chubb wrote: It looks as thought the ACMA has finally got some teeth and is doing something about spam ... Erik I wonder what they can do to stop the chinese, japanese, Erik korean, taiwanese and russian spam that i seem to get

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

Peter Chubb wrote: Erik == Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Erik Peter Chubb wrote: It looks as thought the ACMA has finally got some teeth and is doing something about spam ... Erik I wonder what they can do to stop the chinese, japanese, Erik korean, taiwanese and russian

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

SLUG == SLUG feeding spam to the world [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SLUG Peter Chubb wrote: It looks as thought the ACMA has finally got some teeth and is doing something about spam ... but it also looks as if their website is SLUG Yer, website! That was when I decided that they were not SLUG

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

On 2006.05.31 11:01 Peter Chubb wrote: I've finally got through... there are two bits. For outlook users (none of us, probably) there's a single `button' you can download after you register (you register to get a key, by thelook of it), that deletes the spam, and forwards it with headers. For

Re: [SLUG] `new' effort at spam fighting?

Peter Chubb wrote: I've finally got through... there are two bits. For outlook users (none of us, probably) there's a single `button' you can download after you register (you register to get a key, by thelook of it), that deletes the spam, and forwards it with headers. Am I the only one who