Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:37:54AM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: > OK, I should have RTFM man first. > > ls -lab show the file name to be "\ \ " so I have now answered my own > question. > > Sorry for the noise (back into my box) Another popular way to do it is rm -i * and say "y" when it asks.

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Balial
I just go for zsh tab completion... problem solved! Chuck On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:03:04PM +1100, Peter Hardy wrote: > On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:48, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > Another popular way to do it is rm -i * and say "y" when it asks. > > At the risk of sounding like too

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Peter Hardy
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:48, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > Another popular way to do it is rm -i * and say "y" when it asks. At the risk of sounding like too much of a GUI weenie, another nice way to do it is with one of the many GUI file managers out there. Your favourite X or console based f

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Stuart Cooper
> OK, I should have RTFM man first. > ls -lab show the file name to be "\ \ " so I have now answered my own > question. > Sorry for the noise (back into my box) I didn't know about the -b flag to ls so I found this informative. My traditional way of doing it (which also comes in handy in non

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Terry Collins
Howard Lowndes wrote: > > OK, I should have RTFM man first. You have just experienced the well known "SLUG effect" where you send a question to the list and the collective prescence of "Sluggers" answers the question before it reaches the list. -- Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Howard Lowndes
Yes I am aware of that, but when I did manage to run: file " " then it came back as an RPM that I had been fiddling with at around the time shown in the date stamp, so I am comfortable that it was me who stuffed up, rather than being cracked. On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Broun, Bevan wrote: > on Tue, N

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Broun, Bevan
on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:37:54AM +1100, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I should have RTFM man first. > > ls -lab show the file name to be "\ \ " so I have now answered my own > question. Note that such file names are often used by crackers as a place to put stuff. BB -- SLU

Re: [SLUG] A file with no name (answered)

2001-11-12 Thread Howard Lowndes
OK, I should have RTFM man first. ls -lab show the file name to be "\ \ " so I have now answered my own question. Sorry for the noise (back into my box) On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Howard Lowndes wrote: > I seem to have acquired a file with no name. > > When I do an ls -la then it lists before . and

[SLUG] A file with no name

2001-11-12 Thread Howard Lowndes
I seem to have acquired a file with no name. When I do an ls -la then it lists before . and .. What is the best way to address this file? -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates - Your Linux people Contact detail at http://www.lannetlinux.com "We are either doing something, or we are not. 'Ta