Re: [SLUG] Can SAMBA 3.0.24 be a BDC for a Windows 2003 domain controller?

2007-06-25 Thread Amos Shapira
On 26/06/07, DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You need to get your terminology straight first. I suspected so :). Windows networking is so foreign to me. There's no such thing as a "PDC" or "BDC" in an Active Directory environment - especially a 2003 AD environment. There are PDC and BDC _e

Re: [SLUG] Can SAMBA 3.0.24 be a BDC for a Windows 2003 domain controller?

2007-06-25 Thread DaZZa
On 6/26/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I kept hearing that Samba 3 can join and do anything as a Windows Domain Controller even better than Windows itself. But now that I need it to replace a Backup Domain Controller (fka Secondary Domain Controller?) to a Windows 2003 Activ

Re: [SLUG] Can SAMBA 3.0.24 be a BDC for a Windows 2003 domain controller?

2007-06-25 Thread Dave Kempe
Amos Shapira wrote: And I'm not sure how relevant this is for my situation - is Windows 2003 considered "NT4 PDC" or is it something newer that Samba can cooperate with as a BDC? yeah win2k3 is considered to be an nt4 pdc in this case. so you are fresh out of luck with samba 3. you might have a

[SLUG] Can SAMBA 3.0.24 be a BDC for a Windows 2003 domain controller?

2007-06-25 Thread Amos Shapira
Hello, I kept hearing that Samba 3 can join and do anything as a Windows Domain Controller even better than Windows itself. But now that I need it to replace a Backup Domain Controller (fka Secondary Domain Controller?) to a Windows 2003 Active Directory server I keep bumping into the following