> The point: how come Microsoft's own OS can't run their own products at
> this speed and with this stability ?
Bad software on bad hardware. Win4Lin lets you run bad software on good
software on bad hardware.
- Jeff
--
"It's actually my new bandwidth conservation technique: compresion of
A most interesting concept (OSS software on Windows) and a damn good way
of converting employers... Something else that may / may not assist...
I was playing around with the latest Win4Lin from the December 2002 APC
cover CD (a 30 day trial), running Windows 98 under it
I installed Outlook 20
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> There have been some nibbles for porting GNOME stuff to Windows, to achieve
> the same kind of advantage that OpenOffice has... Hook 'em where they're
> comfortable, let them know it's even better on a Free platform.
That's basically my plan. If I can sho
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 21:56, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Has anyone ever (tried to, successfully) run Evolution under Windows? I
> > know several other GTK programs do spend some time in the land of the long
> > load time, but how about Evolution?
>
> No, unfortunately, the GNOME stuff underneath
> Has anyone ever (tried to, successfully) run Evolution under Windows? I
> know several other GTK programs do spend some time in the land of the long
> load time, but how about Evolution?
No, unfortunately, the GNOME stuff underneath hasn't been ported to Windows
(this may get easier with the
OK, not entirely a Linux question (although it will lead to a Linux
migration in the future). But this is probably the best repository of
Evolution knowledge I hang around in, so here goes.
Has anyone ever (tried to, successfully) run Evolution under Windows? I
know several other GTK programs do
