On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 09:51:41AM +1000, DaZZa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:58:42PM +1000, DaZZa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
> That's why I was somewhat sceptical. Unless you're stupid enough to run
> this th
Wierd indeed. I couldn't find anything on the site that even vaguely
refered to the virus. What I did find was a reference to NT 5.0, which
just goes to show how old it must all be.
It all looks like one big furphey.
--
Howard.
LANNet Compu
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:58:42PM +1000, DaZZa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A computer virus that can infect PCs running either the ubiquitous Windows
> > operating system or the increasingly popular Linux operating system
> > has emerged.
> >
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:58:42PM +1000, DaZZa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> A computer virus that can infect PCs running either the ubiquitous Windows
> operating system or the increasingly popular Linux operating system
> has emerged.
> http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?90166
> ---
>
> Amusing, but l
A computer virus that can infect PCs running either the ubiquitous Windows
operating system or the increasingly popular Linux operating system
has emerged.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?90166
---
Amusing, but lacking somewhat in fact - typical of ZDnet. The web site of
the company which apparently
