Hi all
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
My main recreational interest is bicycles and my motivation is the more
2) The quality of the GE background is crap and makes digitising
exceedingly difficult. It isn't feasible to re-ride all the routes (hey,
I'm open to funding offers though
Dean Hamstead wrote:
does cedega give you better results than wine?
Have not tried cedega yet.
Would love too, when time permits.
For the moment, GoogleEarth is just running
happily on my Win XP.
Thanks.
O Plameras
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Michael Lake wrote:
So, the current problem is finding FOSS or affordable software to do
this good gis work. I have recently been through FOSS offerings, many
and scattered functionality and it looks like a write your own situation.
Look at GRASS. It's a FOSS GIS.
http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2006/05/google_earth_fo_4.html
That blog has a comment that suggests they're not using winelib:
...DiBona answered in the negative, explaining that Google
Earth relied on Qt and GL libraries and code, so additional
WINE support
quote who=Roger Barnes
...DiBona answered in the negative, explaining that Google Earth relied
on Qt and GL libraries and code, so additional WINE support would not
help.
I took that to mean that they might port it using wine, but without
doing additional work on wine itself?
No, it
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
Windows.
Can you tell us
O Plameras wrote:
Okay.
But if you want to know additional info about GoogleEarth, check this page:
I've been playing with it on the other boxen with the idea of doing away
with some guide books that need republishing. Unfortunately it is rather
lacking in what you can do.
OTOH, neither is
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
Okay.
But if you want to know additional info about GoogleEarth, check this page:
I've been playing with it on the other boxen with the idea of doing away
with some guide books that need republishing.
Do you mean travel guide
O Plameras wrote:
Warning, this gets long, but I think it is a good idea to throw it out
there as someone may have some ideas. Borderling OT, but it is comparing
FOSS with so okay..
I've been playing with it on the other boxen with the idea of doing away
with some guide books that need
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
TIA.
O Plameras
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do as googlemars? sigh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do
O Plameras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics
Hal wrote:
O Plameras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with
does cedega give you better results than wine?
Dean
On Thu, June 1, 2006 9:44 pm, O Plameras wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:44 +1000, O Plameras wrote:
A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
Windows.
O Plameras
Just out of
James Purser wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:44 +1000, O Plameras wrote:
A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
Windows.
O
James Purser was once rumoured to have said:
Just out of curiosity, have they considered running Windows under either
VMWare's free server offering or QEMU? That way they can keep all their
linuxy goodness and run the Windows based stuffs they need.
The main reason why VMWare, etc, are
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 10:28 +1000, Crossfire wrote:
The main reason why VMWare, etc, are unsuitable, especially when
GoogleEarth and things like it are involved, is performance. Google
earth eats graphics cards for lunch. VMWare and most other vm hosting
and emulated/dynamic recompilation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do as googlemars? sigh
http://www.google.com/mars/
James
If you go to http://www.google.com/mars/about.html you will find out about where this
data comes from:
- Mars Orbiter
'expect' might help you script it
if you cant get at source and need to bolt some cgi ontop of the curses
Dean
On Fri, June 2, 2006 12:58 pm, Michael Lake wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics
requirements)
Why wont they do as
Dean Hamstead wrote:
'expect' might help you script it
if you cant get at source and need to bolt some cgi ontop of the curses
Actually it looks like a curses app but it's actually a Transportable Applications
Environment app which is a thing developed by NASA in the 1980's. But it looks the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any alternative in OpenSource for GoogleEarth ?
Tried running in Fedora wine, but keeps on locking up.
Much trying, no sucess (even with win4lin etc, fancy graphics requirements)
Why wont they do
: Friday, 2 June 2006 10:42 AM
To: Crossfire
Cc: slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] GoogleEarth alternative in OpenSource
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 10:28 +1000, Crossfire wrote:
The main reason why VMWare, etc, are unsuitable, especially when
GoogleEarth and things like it are involved
O Plameras wrote:
A number of Linux users I know are switching to Windows because they
want to run GoogleEarth. I can understand why they do. My son works
for a Company that use GoogleEarth for work and had to switch to
Windows.
Can you tell us what they were actually doing?
I assume this
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:18:03PM +1000, Roger Barnes wrote:
I understand Google are working on a winelib based GoogleEarth
for Linux, following on from their recent release of Picasa
in the same vein.
http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2006/05/google_earth_fo_4.html
That blog has a
27 matches
Mail list logo
