On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 10:34 +1000, david wrote:
> How do you dump PulseAudio?
In Ubuntu 8.10, the main thing to do is run gstreamer-properties, and
select ALSA as the default output plugin instead of PulseAudio.
In Ubuntu 9.04, the situation is stickier, as the default ALSA device
('default') is
a split second, and I've got music
without soaking up megabytes of my precious RAM!
--- On Sun, 8/2/09, Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> From: Matthew Hannigan
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Music player opinion
> To: "Simon Rumble"
> Cc: slug@slug.org.au
> Received: Sunday, A
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 10:22:19AM +1000, Simon Rumble wrote:
> [ ... ]
> Yep, I want something that mimics the old WinAmp. Dumb, just plays the
> bloody music files I point it at. No bells, no whistles.
If you want winamp-ish, then perhaps Zinf is for you (Zinf is not freeamp,
freeamp is not w
Excerpts from Peter Rundle's message of Mon Aug 03 08:29:57 +1000 2009:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm after a few opinions about a good music player for Linux (Ubuntu). I don't
> like Rhythumbox and Amarok, they use a lot of CPU
> and I really don't like their interface. The player is just a boring old
> rec
> "Peter" == Peter Rundle writes:
Peter> Hi All, I'm after a few opinions about a good music player for
Peter> Linux (Ubuntu). I don't like Rhythumbox and Amarok, they use a
Peter> lot of CPU and I really don't like their interface. The player
Peter> is just a boring old rectangular box and I
Jeremy Visser wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 08:29 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
What ever happened to X-amp? It had really cool interface (like the
nautilus shell) and had a simple play list display by filename. It
used to run great on machines from five years ago and left plenty of
CPU.
I do
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 08:29 +1000, Peter Rundle wrote:
> What ever happened to X-amp? It had really cool interface (like the
> nautilus shell) and had a simple play list display by filename. It
> used to run great on machines from five years ago and left plenty of
> CPU.
I don't know about its
2009/8/3 Peter Rundle
> I'm after a few opinions about a good music player for Linux (Ubuntu). I
> don't like Rhythumbox and Amarok, they use a lot of CPU and I really don't
> like their interface. The player is just a boring old rectangular box and I
> don't want to see half my music listed as "
Hi All,
I'm after a few opinions about a good music player for Linux (Ubuntu). I don't like Rhythumbox and Amarok, they use a lot of CPU
and I really don't like their interface. The player is just a boring old rectangular box and I don't want to see half my music
listed as "Track x unknown of u