Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-05-01 Thread Martin Visser
Amos' advice below is actually not correct in all circumstances. If you are shrinking a NTFS filesystem, you should *NOT* change the host partition size with fdisk first. By doing this, ntfsresize will no longer have access to the tail of the partition you have chopped off, and you will have a

Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-05-01 Thread Martin Visser
An unchecked NTFS filesystem can be mounted in Ubuntu, but only if you force it to be mounted read-only (so at least you can read the data) On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a 120gb SATA HD formatted NTFS ( 2 partitions - dont think 2nd is used/formatted as

Thanks Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-04-30 Thread bill
: Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize? From: Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:03:20 +1000 To: SLUG slug@slug.org.au To: SLUG slug@slug.org.au On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note - Using 57676M ( obtained from result of sudo

[SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-04-29 Thread bill
I have a 120gb SATA HD formatted NTFS ( 2 partitions - dont think 2nd is used/formatted as only 1 shows up) in my Kubuntu Hardy PC. Cant mount the HD, requires CHKDSK to be run as error message says drive not shut down properly. Havent had an XP install on any of my Desktop PCS for 2 years

Re: [SLUG] NTFS HD, chkdsk and ntfsresize?

2008-04-29 Thread Amos Shapira
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note - Using 57676M ( obtained from result of sudo ntfsresize -i /dev/sda1 above) didnt work. Is it safe to use sudo ntfsresize --force -s 43896M /dev/sda1 or do I risk losing my data? You should first resize the partition in