RE: [SLUG] Network authentication

2000-12-03 Thread Jill Rowling
Hi all, NIS is "nice" ie super easy to set up and use but really sadly broken in that any user can see what's in /etc/shadow. The only reason why you would want to use it is if you have to support some NIS-only clients like IRIX O2s AND you never have internet connections from the LAN. NIS+ (NIS

Re: [SLUG] Network authentication

2000-12-03 Thread Craige McWhirter
We're in the progress of doing this ourselves at the moment. I don't think it's something you can just "do". I'm reading "Understanding and Deploying LDAP Directory Services" and doing some research on the net (Google is your friend). From what I've seen so far moving to LDAP looks like it needs a

[SLUG] Network authentication

2000-12-03 Thread James Wilkinson
I need to upgrade the old auth mechanism at work, because it's hella-broken (syncing passwd files across machines), and it's come back to bite me today, so I really want to do soemthing like NIS, only not NIS. I'm thinking authentication using either LDAP or Kerberos, so I'd like comments and tip