Hi,
Does anyone have any experience in using postgrey and fairUCE together ?
Would this combination be better than a challenge/response system like
http://www.totalblock.net/ ?
Thanks
Phil.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs:
Phil Manuel wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience in using postgrey and fairUCE together ?
Would this combination be better than a challenge/response system like
http://www.totalblock.net/ ?
I don't know what postgrey, fairUCE or http://www.totalblock.net/
are, but they would have
On 14/11/06, Phil Manuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience in using postgrey and fairUCE together ?
Would this combination be better than a challenge/response system like
http://www.totalblock.net/ ?
From reading the first few lines describing what postgrey does
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:34:40PM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote:
...and you trust Google not to sell the email addresses of those with
whom you correspond?...
I certainly do, at least, I trust them slightly more
than the average ISP.
Matt
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
On 14/11/06, Howard Lowndes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and you trust Google not to sell the email addresses of those with
whom you correspond?...
*clink*
(That was the sound of yet another dollar going into Google's pockets for
having your address in their spam pool. Thanks for your
From reading the first few lines describing what postgrey does (reject
connections and hoping that spammers won't retry) then it sounds like a
doomed tactic since I've just read (on Security Fix? not sure) that
spammers
got over this silly hurdle and now will retry, causing even more
traffic
This one time, at band camp, Adam Kennedy wrote:
It's only a matter of time till the image spam is sophisticated enough
to existing OCR software, even fuzzy OCR, is going to start getting in
trouble.
Exactly. If the spammers can't get around Captchas[1], then our
software likely won't be
