On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, David Kempe wrote:
> > painful. I am still looking forward to all this fun when TL goes to
> > rpm-4.0...
> Whats TL?
TurboLinux - a distribution that is rpm based like RH but comes secure
(networking-wise) by default.
tom.
Consultant
AUSSECPhone: 61 4 1768 2202
339 Bla
> painful. I am still looking forward to all this fun when TL goes to
> rpm-4.0...
Whats TL?
dave
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Stephen Mills wrote:
> I found it quite frustrating in Redhat's approach in upgrading RPM, as
> another person pointed out, probably to prompt more sales.
Guys, please do not say things like that without first asking for the
reason behind this.
The reason is as follows:
Rpm v
Hi Guys,
Thanks a bunch for your suggestions, upgrading to RPM 3.0.6 solved my
problem. I would of never considered this process.
Hehe sendmail is complaining about compiling with missing header
files, and as Dave correctly pointed out the compiled RPM version
complains about glibc. No matter I'
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Thom May wrote:
> At this point I have two comments.
> The fix -iirc- is to install rpm v3.0.5 or later which is compatable with
> rpm's v4.
> rpm -Uvh rpm-{version}.rpm
>
> The other is that making a totally incompatible major change to
> something like RPM is a,IMO, Micro$
Stephen Mills wrote:
>
> Hi,
> If anyone has any idea, feel free to give me a yell.
> [root@davros nighty]# rpm -U rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm
> only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of
> RPM
> error: rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm cannot be installed
There is a .tar.gz copy of the rpm
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Stephen Mills wrote:
> Hi,
> If anyone has any idea, feel free to give me a yell.
>
> Redhat 6.1, sendmail has been cleanly removed, want to install new
> version. I did a search on the web, with no cluesyes the rpm's
> were downloaded in bin mode.
>
> [root@davros nigh
> The other is that making a totally incompatible major change to
> something like RPM is a,IMO, Micro$oftian thing to do. Ho hum.
> -Thom
Frustrates me too, esp when you try to do things like upgrade sendmail :/
However, I do understand the need to move on in terms of features glibc
binaries etc
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:20:00 +1000, Stephen Mills said:
> Hi,
> If anyone has any idea, feel free to give me a yell.
>
> Redhat 6.1, sendmail has been cleanly removed, want to install new
> version. I did a search on the web, with no cluesyes the rpm's
> were downloaded in bin mode.
>
>
; Stephen Mills
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 December 2000 11:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SLUG] RPM Fun
>
>
> Hi,
> If anyone has any idea, feel free to give me a yell.
>
> Redhat 6.1, sendmail has been cleanly removed, want to install new
> version. I did a search on
Hi,
If anyone has any idea, feel free to give me a yell.
Redhat 6.1, sendmail has been cleanly removed, want to install new
version. I did a search on the web, with no cluesyes the rpm's
were downloaded in bin mode.
[root@davros nighty]# rpm --rebuild sendmail-8.11.0-8.src.rpm
Installing se
11 matches
Mail list logo