[SLUG] Re: Email Client

2011-06-14 Thread Richard Ibbotson
Jam wrote: , how do you disable muk? I've tried everything including *removing* all trace (which means kmail won't run) and all the disable switches I can find, but using these one has to start kmail twice, first time fails with nep-errors :-( Open up settings from the KDE menu and find

Re: [SLUG] Re: Email Client

2011-06-14 Thread James Linder
On 15/06/2011, at 10:00 AM, slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote: , how do you disable muk? I've tried everything including *removing* all trace (which means kmail won't run) and all the disable switches I can find, but using these one has to start kmail twice, first time fails with nep-errors

[SLUG] Re: Email Client

2011-06-13 Thread Richard Ibbotson
On Monday 13 June 2011 09:57:38 Jam wrote: IMHO thunderbird is completely unusable ... Try to reply to an issue (eg this one) when you get digest mail and you will get a deep and clear understanding of stress. kmail is pretty nice but has some show stoppers eg nepomuk (some utterley

[SLUG] Re: Email Client

2011-06-13 Thread elliott-brennan
I'd second Thunderbird :)) I know the 'reply list' function isn't great when, as Jam said, you have digest mail list to reply to. However (and this is strange but works well) in version 2 (something) and the current version 3, if you highlight the e-mail text you want to respond to and the

Re: [SLUG] Re: Email Client

2011-06-13 Thread Jam
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:00:02 AM slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote: IMHO thunderbird is completely unusable ... Try to reply to an issue (eg this one) when you get digest mail and you will get a deep and clear understanding of stress. kmail is pretty nice but has some show