[SLUG] Re: Re: Netscrape 6 is here

2000-11-16 Thread Angus Lees
\begin{Jeff Waugh} > (I have to admit, I still use Netscape a fair bit. I should just delete the > icon on my panel, but the X resources I use make it come up in *such* a > pretty purple...) hah. so when is gtk / gnome / mozilla going to support defacto standards like Xresources and "-display" o

Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Netscrape 6 is here

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff Waugh
> hah. > > so when is gtk / gnome / mozilla going to support defacto standards > like Xresources and "-display" options ? Yeah. Very annoying. The argument for not supporting "-display" in Gnome is that being a GNU project, it uses GNU long options. So, GTK+/GNOME support "--display" instead

Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Netscrape 6 is here

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff Waugh
> The argument for not supporting "-display" in Gnome is that being a GNU > project, it uses GNU long options. I should clarify for anyone who doesn't know what that means... I forgot the real results of that myself for a second there. With GNU software, -display would be interpreted as -d -i

Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Netscrape 6 is here

2000-11-16 Thread Rodney Gedda
'Jeff Waugh' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > [*] James is an Aussie Gnome hacker from WA. You may know him from Gnome > projects such as "gnorpm" (also Our Malcolm! :P), Dia and the very cool > libglade. And very helpful too, I must say. > Just to keep Rodney from poking me in the eye, I'll link

Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: Netscrape 6 is here

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Errr.http://www.linuxworld.com.au under the TOP STORY and I quote; > > "Contributed by Rodney Gedda 2000-11-16" > ^^ > Although putting the date with the article body is worth looking into. That's what I meant. :) When people collect stories on