On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:17:56AM +1100, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>
> what do you for date checks ?
>
> I have something like this, but, it requires altering every 365 days...
>
> header_checks
> ...
> /^Date:.*[a-z][a-z][a-z] 200[0-4]/ REJECT Your email has a ..
> /^Date:.*[a-z][a-z][
> what do you for date checks ?
I don't.
- Jeff
--
Open CeBIT 2007: Sydney, Australia http://www.opencebit.com.au/
make: *** No rule to make target `whoopee'. Stop.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs:
On Thu, January 11, 2007 4:22 pm, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Postfix for the win.
> In /etc/postfix/mime_header_checks.regexp:
Jeff,
what do you for date checks ?
I have something like this, but, it requires altering every 365 days...
header_checks
...
/^Date:.*[a-z][a-z][a-z] 200[0-4]/
Sonia,
http://www.akadia.com/services/postfix_uce.html
Scroll to the "Header and Body Checks" section, although the whole thing
is worth a read.
DSL
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
On 1/11/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahh is that what it is, but can't they also be .rma
And that would as a guess be realmedia audio files (aka no video). But
that's a guess of course. I guess someone could block those too.
Thanks
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing
> Just a quick query on the above line. Shouldn't |do| read |do[ct]|
> and |xl} read |xl[st]}
No. I'm happy to get that stuff because more often than not it's something I
actually want to receive... *or* the bad ones are painfully obvious before
even opening them... *or* I don't use any
On 1/11/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Fox wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>>
/filename=\"?(.*)\.(bat|chm|cmd|com|do|exe|hta|jse|rm|scr|pif|vbe|vbs|vxd|xl)\"?$/
>> REJECT For security reasons we reject attachments of this type
>>
>> Ju
On 1/11/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
/filename=\"?(.*)\.(bat|chm|cmd|com|do|exe|hta|jse|rm|scr|pif|vbe|vbs|vxd|xl)\"?$/
REJECT For security reasons we reject attachments of this type
Just a quick query on the above line. Shouldn't |do| read |do[ct]|
and |xl} read |xl
* On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:22:32PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
> > I see you run Exim - any postfix users got ideas on how to do this in
> > Postfix (ie block the mentioned type of attachments).
>
> Postfix for the win.
Thanks heaps!
--
Sonia Hamilton. GPG key A8B77238.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux
> * On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:02:12PM +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> > I recently blocked .jpg and .gif attachments on our server here at
> > bong.com.au (which also serves fragfest.com.au)
> >
> > We also block .exe .com .scr .doc .xls .ppt
>
> I see you run Exim - any postfix users got ideas
* On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:02:12PM +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> I recently blocked .jpg and .gif attachments on our server
> here at bong.com.au (which also serves fragfest.com.au)
>
>
> We also block .exe .com .scr .doc .xls .ppt
I see you run Exim - any postfix users got ideas on how to do
I recently blocked .jpg and .gif attachments on our server
here at bong.com.au (which also serves fragfest.com.au)
fortunately we dont have many users so its not a huge drama.
But its great that so much spam is image spam, because
adding such a rule has dropped our spam *enormously*
I also have
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 08:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've just noticed that the spam level hitting my mail server
> > has increased 4 to 4 fold overnight, most of it being dropped
> > at the CONNECT stage.
> > http://www.lannet.com.au/traffic/h48/index.html
> >
> > Has anyone else notic
Robert Thorsby wrote:
On 2007.01.10 06:19 Howard Lowndes wrote:
I've just noticed that the spam level hitting my mail server
has increased 4 to 4 fold overnight, most of it being dropped
at the CONNECT stage.
http://www.lannet.com.au/traffic/h48/index.html
Has anyone else noticed similar?
Yes
yes as well.
I have IPCop with Copfilter and I'm not sure that it's doing too much to
stop it as it still ends up in the inbox.
I'm having to train thunderbird to treat it as spam.
Any copfilter users here who are *not* getting any spam?
Ben
Howard Lowndes wrote:
I've just noticed that the spa
On 2007.01.10 06:19 Howard Lowndes wrote:
I've just noticed that the spam level hitting my mail server
has increased 4 to 4 fold overnight, most of it being dropped
at the CONNECT stage.
http://www.lannet.com.au/traffic/h48/index.html
Has anyone else noticed similar?
Yes, there has been a mass
16 matches
Mail list logo
