At 08:39 AM 8/9/00 , DaZZa wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Rick Welykochy wrote:
Who died and made you god, Rick?
The King.
He's not dead, he's running the 7/11 at Hornsby!
Thank you very much...
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info:
Not to rain on your parade or anthing, but for what it is worth, Optus has
exactly this sort of a problem at the moment, with too many of there users
trying to use all of the bandwidth at once and run it as fast as they can
24/7.
Cable is a rather different beast to a dial up modem,
By the way, assuming I'll be connecting to Telstra for ADSL is pretty dumb
- because I may not. There _are_ other options, despite your obvious
ignorance of them.
Just on this note when i talked to the telstra guy about getting on the
adsl trial they said that there would/should be other ADSL
what?
yeah, yeah. Piss off and rub it in, why don'tcha?
DaZZa - no ADSL in Hornsby. :-(
What? I checked on the telstra site and it would be there for me.
My ph no starts with 9477 if that makes a difference.
BTW, does ADSL stand for Asyncronous or Asymmetric DSL?
Dave
--
SLUG - Sydney
BTW, does ADSL stand for Asyncronous or Asymmetric DSL?
Awesome DSL ;)
Jason
--
GnuPG Key 2450EEDC Jason Rennie[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 1A2B 5E34 B45A 2871 A488 99C7 7579 5FFC 2450 EEDC
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info:
Jason Rennie wrote:
Cable is a rather different beast to a dial up modem, and the usage etc is
more open to abuse (as optus has discovered), so i think your comaprision
doesn't really work that well.
ADSL is open to exactly the same kind of abuse. Failure to restrain
abusers is
From: David Kempe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
BTW, does ADSL stand for Asyncronous or Asymmetric DSL?
Asymmetric. It has a different speed upstream to downstream.
John Wiltshire
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info:
John Wiltshire wrote:
From: Jason Rennie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Not to rain on your parade or anthing, but for what it is worth, Optus has
exactly this sort of a problem at the moment, with too many of there users
trying to use all of the bandwidth at once and run it as fast as they can
Guys,
ihug is trialing ADSL as well, so there is a choice coming.
Steve
"First, it's done on UNIX, then done on Windows. It's always the way..."
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Jason Rennie wrote:
By the way, assuming I'll be connecting to
Andrew Macks wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Roland Turner wrote:
The local cable loop _can_ be a bottleneck, but the pressures that bring
this about are commercial, not technical. Likely circumstances include:
- Optus has grossly underprovisioned and is being swamped with business.
DaZZa wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Roland Turner wrote:
The difference between ADSL and HFC systems is that HFC system uses a
_shared_ carrier - it's more of a broadcast system - and ADSL is a
_direct_ connection - you get your 1.5 meg ALL the time - not just when
none of your
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, David Kempe wrote:
yeah, yeah. Piss off and rub it in, why don'tcha?
DaZZa - no ADSL in Hornsby. :-(
What? I checked on the telstra site and it would be there for me.
My ph no starts with 9477 if that makes a difference.
I checked today - 9482 is both my numbers - not
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Roland Turner wrote:
I have the impression that Dazza's point is subtly different: his
viewpoint appears (to me) to be that if you choose cable you will get
poorer service because you are using a shared access medium whereas if
you choose ADSL you will get better service
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, DaZZa wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Rick Welykochy wrote:
Just on this note when i talked to the telstra guy about getting on the
Bullocks.
This is the most off-topic rant I've seen for a long time.
Can it.
Who died and made you god, Rick?
The King.
--
Rick Welykochy wrote:
Who died and made you god, Rick?
The King.
Fscking monarchists!
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.woa.com.au
or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WOA Computer Services lan/wan, linux/unix,
On Tue, 08 Aug 2000, Rick Welykochy generated:
This is the most off-topic rant I've seen for a long time.
To everyone who's sick of this thread, my apologies. I'll try not to
let off a misinformed rant in the future -- well, not on this list,
anyway :)
--
jamesw
"I've been up before. I've
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Terry Collins wrote:
-=Fscking monarchists!
And which version of fsck would that be, Terry ???...:-)
--
Regards,
Jon
-
"It is irresponsible to allow a Windows machine to be connected to
the
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Rick Welykochy wrote:
Who died and made you god, Rick?
The King.
He's not dead, he's running the 7/11 at Hornsby!
:-)
DaZZa
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
Not sure if anyone has posted this yet since in the ADSL thread
since I've been quickly reading over it but telstra have slashed the bandwidth
on the cable service.
Cable connections will now have max bandwidth of 256k rather than 400k.
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 05:11:14PM +1000, John Ferlito wrote:
Not sure if anyone has posted this yet since in the ADSL thread
since I've been quickly reading over it but telstra have slashed the bandwidth
on the cable service.
Cable connections will now have max bandwidth of
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, John Ferlito wrote:
Not sure if anyone has posted this yet since in the ADSL thread
since I've been quickly reading over it but telstra have slashed the bandwidth
on the cable service.
Cable connections will now have max bandwidth of 256k rather than 400k.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, James Wilkinson wrote:
Cable connections will now have max bandwidth of 256k rather than 400k.
Apologies to everyone who's explained why O@H is no good for them but:
why would you bother at all with telescum? I mean... optus cable is
download capped at 3Mbit, like
From: DaZZa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, James Wilkinson wrote:
Cable connections will now have max bandwidth of 256k
rather than 400k.
Apologies to everyone who's explained why O@H is no good
for them but:
why would you bother at all with telescum? I
From: Jason Rennie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This is based on the somewhat false assumption that all people are using
their full bandwidth all of the time. Given that the average ISP has at
least 10 users per modem and at least 10 times the number of modems that
their external bandwidth
From: "DaZZa" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, John Wiltshire wrote:
Sure - 2 meg - SHARED_ access - and if you have, say, 20
people on each
cable segment - that 2 meg disappears pretty quickly.
This is based on the somewhat false assumption that all people are using
their
Quoting DaZZa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Jason Rennie wrote:
DaZZa - who'll still be going ADSL if Telstra
makes it available in his
area.
Already there and it rips along :)
yeah, yeah. Piss off and rub it in, why don'tcha?
DaZZa - no ADSL in Hornsby. :-(
Don't you
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Jason Rennie wrote:
DaZZa - no ADSL in Hornsby. :-(
They aren't planning to roll it out there when the trial finishes
in september ?
Stuff September - I want it _now_!
DaZZa
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info:
DaZZa wrote:
The difference between ADSL and HFC systems is that HFC system uses a
_shared_ carrier - it's more of a broadcast system - and ADSL is a
_direct_ connection - you get your 1.5 meg ALL the time - not just when
none of your neighbours are using the net as well as you.
That's a
Jason Rennie wrote:
Not to rain on your parade or anthing, but for what it is worth, Optus has
exactly this sort of a problem at the moment, with too many of there users
trying to use all of the bandwidth at once and run it as fast as they can
24/7.
Cable is a rather different beast to a
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Roland Turner wrote:
The difference between ADSL and HFC systems is that HFC system uses a
_shared_ carrier - it's more of a broadcast system - and ADSL is a
_direct_ connection - you get your 1.5 meg ALL the time - not just when
none of your neighbours are using the
30 matches
Mail list logo