Terry Collins wrote:
>
> I do a mount -va and get RPC program not registered.
>
> So what does this mean in relation to nfs on debian woody. I know the
> error comes from mounting two exports from another linux boxen
> (successfully mounted elsewhere).
This problem has been fixed, but not solved
Terry Collins wrote:
Investigating further.
I have two boxen that have been set up from the same set of CDs.
BoxenA works.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/latex/2003$ dpkg -l |grep nfs
ii nfs-common 1.0-2 NFS support files common to client and
serve
ii nfs-kernel-ser 1.0-2 Kernel NFS s
Investigating further.
I have two boxen that have been set up from the same set of CDs.
BoxenA works.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/latex/2003$ dpkg -l |grep nfs
ii nfs-common 1.0-2 NFS support files common to client and
serve
ii nfs-kernel-ser 1.0-2 Kernel NFS server support
rc nf
Michael Lake wrote:
> You only need one of nfs-kernel-server and nfs-user-server.
and, the problems is.If I turn them all off and do a mount -va, I
still get the same error (whilst the nfs lines are in /etc/fstab). head
scritch. Definitely related to the prescence of the entry in fstab.
--
Terry Collins wrote:
Michael Lake wrote:
I have just installed nfs last week on Debian machines.
I also got the error message about the RPC stuff. Turns out I had
installed nfs-common but not nfs-kernel-server. It's the later package
that supplies the programs:
/usr/sbin/rpc.mountd
/usr/sbin/rpc.
Michael Lake wrote:
> I have just installed nfs last week on Debian machines.
> I also got the error message about the RPC stuff. Turns out I had
> installed nfs-common but not nfs-kernel-server. It's the later package
> that supplies the programs:
> /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd
> /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd
I ha
Terry Collins wrote:
I do a mount -va and get RPC program not registered.
So what does this mean in relation to nfs on debian woody. I know the
error comes from mounting two exports from another linux boxen
(successfully mounted elsewhere).
I have just installed nfs last week on Debian machines.
I
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Terry Collins wrote:
> Mike MacCana wrote:
> >
> > Is the portmap services running?
>
> Yes.
I frequently get caught out now and then by the default firewalls on
RedHat. Do newer debian setups have a firewall by default these days?
Basically the portmapper service has to
tone wrote:
>
> you can get a list of rpc services registered with
>
> rpcinfo -p localhost
>
> also, apparently nfs v3 doesn't use rpc anymore, and has it's own tcp
> port (2049) - dunno much else about it tho
You might have hit on something there as;
rpcinfo -p localhost shows 2 nfs items,
you can get a list of rpc services registered with
rpcinfo -p localhost
also, apparently nfs v3 doesn't use rpc anymore, and has it's own tcp
port (2049) - dunno much else about it tho
tone
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:12, Terry Collins wrote:
> I do a mount -va and get RPC program not registered
Mike MacCana wrote:
>
> Is the portmap services running?
Yes.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Is the portmap services running?
Mike
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:12, Terry Collins wrote:
> I do a mount -va and get RPC program not registered.
>
> So what does this mean in relation to nfs on debian woody. I know the
> error comes from mounting two exports from another linux boxen
> (successfull
I do a mount -va and get RPC program not registered.
So what does this mean in relation to nfs on debian woody. I know the
error comes from mounting two exports from another linux boxen
(successfully mounted elsewhere).
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at woa.com.au www:
http://www.woa
13 matches
Mail list logo
