RE: [SLUG] hwclock, date, and time zones ...

2003-06-10 Thread August Simonelli
> >If the sequence > # hwclock --hctosys > # date >shows the correct time, then > delay some time > # date >shows an incorrect time, then the issue is that something else >is skewing the system time after the initial sequence has been run. > >My guess is you're running ntpdate or rtime

Re: [SLUG] hwclock, date, and time zones ...

2003-06-10 Thread Peter Chubb
> "Jamie" == Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jamie> This one time, at band camp, August Simonelli wrote: >> Typing hwclock -r reports the correct time, so I know the hardware >> clock is ok. I then do hwclock --hctosys to set the system time. >> When I type date it is correct. Ja

Re: [SLUG] hwclock, date, and time zones ...

2003-06-10 Thread Anthony Wood
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:21:09AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, August Simonelli wrote: > >Typing hwclock -r reports the correct time, so I know the hardware clock > >is ok. > >I then do hwclock --hctosys to set the system time. > >When I type date it is correct. >

Re: [SLUG] hwclock, date, and time zones ...

2003-06-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, August Simonelli wrote: >Typing hwclock -r reports the correct time, so I know the hardware clock >is ok. >I then do hwclock --hctosys to set the system time. >When I type date it is correct. Check what /etc/localtime points to, if it is a symlink; if not copy over /us

[SLUG] hwclock, date, and time zones ...

2003-06-10 Thread August Simonelli
Hi all, I am having some trouble understanding how to get the software clock to stay set on my red hat 9 box. Typing hwclock -r reports the correct time, so I know the hardware clock is ok. I then do hwclock --hctosys to set the system time. When I type date it is correct. Then, about 5 minutes