Re: [SLUG] missing scsi tape drive

2005-07-18 Thread ashley maher
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:09 +1000, Crossfire wrote: > David Gillies was once rumoured to have said: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > ashley maher wrote: > > > I have an IBM xServer 226, with ServerRaid. dmesg does not detect the > > > scsi tape drive. More /proc/scsi/s

Re: [SLUG] missing scsi tape drive

2005-07-18 Thread Crossfire
David Gillies was once rumoured to have said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > ashley maher wrote: > > I have an IBM xServer 226, with ServerRaid. dmesg does not detect the > > scsi tape drive. More /proc/scsi/scsi finds the existance (ie model > > number no details like it kn

Re: [SLUG] missing scsi tape drive

2005-07-18 Thread David Gillies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ashley maher wrote: > I have an IBM xServer 226, with ServerRaid. dmesg does not detect the > scsi tape drive. More /proc/scsi/scsi finds the existance (ie model > number no details like it knows something is there not a clue what) of > the drive but n

Re: [SLUG] missing scsi tape drive

2005-07-17 Thread Del
I'm using ubuntu hoary. However finding the same as above. Googling hasn't got me far. Any suggestions, hints, ideas, relivant urls, abuse great fully received. With all due respect to the distro you're running, you'll need to get the actual IBM serverraid driver from IBM and stick that in you

[SLUG] missing scsi tape drive

2005-07-16 Thread ashley maher
I have an IBM xServer 226, with ServerRaid. dmesg does not detect the scsi tape drive. More /proc/scsi/scsi finds the existance (ie model number no details like it knows something is there not a clue what) of the drive but not much else. There is no st0, nor indication of the tape drives existance