Re: [SLUG] telstra adsl bug?

2000-08-05 Thread Ken Yap
>anyone care to give me a brief summary of how atm works? ;) > >all i know about atm is its connection-oriented and has really small >(53 bytes?) packets. > >specifically, what does atm do with (as a hypothetical example) a >packet of 1500 bytes? (my two bits of atm knowledge imply it isn't >going

Re: [SLUG] telstra adsl bug?

2000-08-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Angus Lees wrote: > > before everyone gets really excited about masquerading and adsl, i > think i've uncovered a bug in telstra's end of the adsl > connection.. more details later, i just want to confirm some things > first: Yes, ATM cells contain a 48 byte payload and a 5 byte header. But you

Re: [SLUG] telstra adsl bug?

2000-08-04 Thread Roland Turner
Angus Lees wrote: > before everyone gets really excited about masquerading and adsl, i > think i've uncovered a bug in telstra's end of the adsl > connection.. more details later, i just want to confirm some things > first: > > i presume i'm right in saying that i should *NEVER* see a fragmented

[SLUG] telstra adsl bug?

2000-08-04 Thread Angus Lees
before everyone gets really excited about masquerading and adsl, i think i've uncovered a bug in telstra's end of the adsl connection.. more details later, i just want to confirm some things first: i presume i'm right in saying that i should *NEVER* see a fragmented TCP packet? (cos the DF bit