Re: [SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S?

2001-09-13 Thread John Ferlito
day, 14 September 2001 7:48 AM > To: SLUG Mailing List > Subject: [SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S? > > > Situation > Perform a customised server installation of RH7.1 with RAID 1 > > Mission > Create a multi-partition RAID 1 set on two identical IDE

RE: [SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S?

2001-09-13 Thread Marty Richards
oward Lowndes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 14 September 2001 7:48 AM To: SLUG Mailing List Subject: [SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S? Situation Perform a customised server installation of RH7.1 with RAID 1 Mission Create a multi-partition RAID 1 set on two identical IDE d

RE: [SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S?

2001-09-13 Thread Jill Rowling
; Sent: Friday, 14 September 2001 7:48 > To: SLUG Mailing List > Subject: [SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S? > > At this point I selected hda and set up the partitions I > wanted, noting that the > C/H/S was 2434/63/255 giving blocks of 16065*512 bytes. > I then selected hdc b

[SLUG] to C/H/S, or not to C/H/S?

2001-09-13 Thread Howard Lowndes
Situation Perform a customised server installation of RH7.1 with RAID 1 Mission Create a multi-partition RAID 1 set on two identical IDE drives, /dev/hda & /dev/hdc (Seagate ST320410A). Execution Perform a graphical RH7.1 install, but when it gets to the bit about creatin