Re: [SLUG] Weird CDROM behaviour under Linux only

2001-02-21 Thread Terry Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've read through the CDROM howto, burt there's no mention of a problem > like I had recently. > > A friend and I put together a PC for a friend of ours, from spare > parts - *except* for the CDROM, which is a new 48x unit. It's a 1996 ...snip > > Weird proble

Re: [SLUG] Weird CDROM behaviour under Linux only

2001-02-21 Thread luke
On 22 Feb, Terry Collins wrote: > I have had problems with various no-name CDroms being recognised by > Linux over the years, particularly with older HW (486 & Pentium mobo's). > so you are not mad. The only solution I've found is to try another > brand. But wouldn't that be more determin

Re: [SLUG] Weird CDROM behaviour under Linux only

2001-02-21 Thread Terry Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (I didn't know that the new driver supported up to 6 IDE interfaces! > So that'd be up to 12 discs; at say 60Gb per disc, you could easily > have 0.7 terabytes on your desktop.) Which means your backup devices is SCSI, so you might as well buy scsi stuff anyway {:-)

RE: [SLUG] Weird CDROM behaviour under Linux only

2001-02-21 Thread Jill Rowling
hehehe maybe that's why M$ CDROM drivers make such great toasters! Ignore all interrupts, they are only there to annoy the programmer! Why on earth would hardware engineers put interrupts in... Oh, full buffer? I never would guess that a computer could get busy... (mumble mutter) - Jill. -- Jill

Re: [SLUG] Weird CDROM behaviour under Linux only

2001-02-21 Thread luke
On 22 Feb, Terry Collins wrote: > Which means your backup devices is SCSI, so you might as well buy scsi > stuff anyway {:-) Good point! :-) But aren't EIDE drives considerably cheaper than scsi, still? So, you could make yourself a nice RAID system, which would help. Then, just back it u