[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The only way that I've been able to install ubuntu on my pentium-m laptop is
this bizare sequence:
This lappy installs SuSE 10.2 without any fuss, and as a server seems to run
perfectly (with the hand-crafted generic kernel, the server kernel gives a
register dump
To convert a Ubuntu server to desktop, I am pretty sure the all you need
is to "apt-get install ubuntu-desktop" which will add the virtual
package (and all its dependencies.
It sounds like your video chipset is causing you grief with the liveCD.
In cases like this, I always use the "alternate" CD
I'm using Ubuntu Hardy on servers (one mail, one web/database/dns of mine, plus one fileserver run
by my son-in-law) and we have not found the need to upgrade. I'm waiting for the next LTS.
I don't think this is viable on desktop but on server I think it's more than desirable. If it ain't
broke
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 21:40 +1100, david wrote:
> A little bird told me that the latest Ubuntu does ext4 by default (is
> this so? should you care?) so that may be a factor for you. Changing
> filesystems is probably something you would rather avoid.
An upgrade from Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (ext3) to Ubunt
Steven Tucker wrote:
Hi all,
I will soon be replacing a Windows 2003 server in a small business with some
Linux variant. Traditionally I have used Debian or Centos, I have been wary of
using Ubuntu (whether justified or not, I was not confident with it on a
server).
Im now slowly being won o
Steven Tucker wrote:
My question is .. the next LTS version is 10.04, but my deployment will
likely be in January. What do people think the best course of action is?
install 9.04 and upgrade
That was suppose to be 9.10, latest version, then upgrade to 10.04
Tuxta
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux U
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 20:49:58 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
> I will soon be replacing a Windows 2003 server in a small business with
> some Linux variant. Traditionally I have used Debian or Centos, I have been
> wary of using Ubuntu (whether justified or not, I was not confident with it
2009/11/3 Steven Tucker :
> Hi all,
>
> I will soon be replacing a Windows 2003 server in a small business with some
> Linux variant. Traditionally I have used Debian or Centos, I have been wary
> of using Ubuntu (whether justified or not, I was not confident with it on a
> server).
>
> Im now s
On 5/12/06, Martin Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just a heads up for anyone installing ubuntu-server, SSH server is not
installed by default.
Ahuh..
Further more the mysql-server package also only listens to localhost
by default too, and you have to modify the bind-address line in
/etc/mysq
