Re: top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-05 Thread Jim Lemon
James Purser wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 12:40 +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: I would dearly love to move to palimpsest-posting, but given the Yep, Peter, you've nailed it. | I want to see side posting implemented

Re: top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-03 Thread James Purser
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 12:40 +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: > Yep, Peter, you've nailed it. | I want to see > side posting implemented > | I think this > would be a good thing as well as > My thinking is

top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-03 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM +1000, Peter Rundle wrote: > >top posting is the new black > > Agreed. > In spite of the claims by the bottom posters that it's more natural > because people read things in order that only applies if the reader is > reading the given e-mail in isolation. Howev