Re: top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-05 Thread Jim Lemon
James Purser wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 12:40 +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: I would dearly love to move to palimpsest-posting, but given the Yep, Peter, you've nailed it. | I want to see side posting implemented

top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-03 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM +1000, Peter Rundle wrote: top posting is the new black Agreed. In spite of the claims by the bottom posters that it's more natural because people read things in order that only applies if the reader is reading the given e-mail in isolation. However, if

Re: top posting (Re: [SLUG] WAS FC5 Kernel headers)

2006-04-03 Thread James Purser
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 12:40 +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: Yep, Peter, you've nailed it. | I want to see side posting implemented | I think this would be a good thing as well as My thinking is