Hi Bill,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Bill Barth wrote:
> If you add the same line from /etc/pam.d/system-auth (or your OS’s
> equivalent) to /etc/pam.d/slurm, then srun- and sbatch-initiated shells and
> processes will also have the directory properly set up.
Hi,
On 7/6/2017 2:38 AM, Victor Gamayunov wrote:
>
>knl_generic plugin on non-KNL node
>Hi,
>
>i have a cluster with a mix of regular Xeon and KNL nodes. I use knl_generic
>to switch KNL modes which works very well.
>However, there is a side effect on non-KNL nodes: every time I allocate a
Fortunately, once we figured out what systemd was doing, we didn’t need to
interact with it besides adding its PAM module configuration line to slurm’s
PAM config file.
Best,
Bill.
--
Bill Barth, Ph.D., Director, HPC
bba...@tacc.utexas.edu| Phone: (512) 232-7069
Office: ROC 1.435
Bill, thankyou very much for that. I guess I have to get my systemd hat on.
A hat which is very large and composed of many parts, and indeed functions
as a pair of pants too.
On 10 August 2017 at 14:33, Bill Barth wrote:
> If you use a modern enough OS (RHEL/CentOS 7,
Am 10. August 2017 13:47:21 MESZ, schrieb Sean McGrath :
>
>Yes, you can run slurm on a single node. There is no need for for a
>different
>head and compute node(s).
>
>You will need to set Shared=Yes if you want multiple people to be able
>to run on
>the machine
how stupid I am,
your perfectly right!
How by hell was I unable to see that before I upgraded? I really need
hollydays. Sorry for inconvenience.
Maybe the error message could be enhanced like this:
This is slurm controler host, slurmd doesn't need to run on controller host
except if you list
Hi,
I think you shouldn't run slurmd on your ControlMachine node (but run
slurmctld and slurmdbd), as in your configuration I don't see that
slurm_master has its NodeName line.
So you should either add slurm_master to your slurm.conf in NodeName
line or not start slurmd on the slurm_master.
Hi,
I've upgraded slurm 15.08.3 (built from rpmbuild -tb ) to 17.02.6 on
centos-7-x86_64.
Since I've done that, slurmd refuse to start on ControlMachine and on
Backupcontroller. (it starts fine on compute nodes)
The error is: slurmd: fatal: Unable to determine this slurmd's NodeName
If I
If you use a modern enough OS (RHEL/CentOS 7, etc), XDG_RUNTIME_DIR will
probably be set and mounted (it’s a tmpfs with a limited max size mounted,
per-session, under /run/user/) on your login nodes, any node that
environment propagates to (like the first compute node of a job), and anywhere
Yes, you can run slurm on a single node. There is no need for for a different
head and compute node(s).
You will need to set Shared=Yes if you want multiple people to be able to run on
the machine simultaneously.
The slurm.conf will have a single node defined in it.
Best
Sean
On Thu, Aug
Hi Everyone,
In order to use resources more efficiently on a server that has 64 CPU Cores
and 1 TB of RAM, is it possible to use SLURM on a stand alone server, or do you
always need a head node and compute nodes to setup the clients? Please advise.
Thank you.
Carlos.
Fokke, thankyou very much for the response.
On 10 August 2017 at 10:07, Fokke Dijkstra wrote:
> We use the spank-private-tmp plugin developed at HPC2N in Sweden:
> https://github.com/hpc2n/spank-private-tmp
>
> See also: https://slurm.schedmd.com/SUG14/private_tmp.pdf
> for
We use the spank-private-tmp plugin developed at HPC2N in Sweden:
https://github.com/hpc2n/spank-private-tmp
See also: https://slurm.schedmd.com/SUG14/private_tmp.pdf
for a presentation about the plugin.
2017-08-10 9:31 GMT+02:00 John Hearns :
> I am sure someone
I am sure someone discussed this topic on this list a few months ago... if
it rings any bells please let me know.
I am not discussing setting the TMPDIR environment variable and crateing a
new TMPDIR directory on a per job basis - though thankyou for the help I
did get when discussing this.
14 matches
Mail list logo