On 24/05/17 13:45, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
> Not yet - that's part of the next update cycle :/
Ah well that might help, along with pam_slurm_adopt so that users
SSH'ing into nodes they have jobs on are put into a cgroup of theirs on
that node.
Helps catch any legacy SSH based MPI launchers (and
On 24 May 2017 at 13:18, Christopher Samuel wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 24/05/17 13:10, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
>
> > Occasionally I'll see a bunch of processes "running" (sleeping) on a
> > node well after the job they are associated with has finished.
> >
> > How does this happen - does slurm not m
Hiya,
On 24/05/17 13:10, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
> Occasionally I'll see a bunch of processes "running" (sleeping) on a
> node well after the job they are associated with has finished.
>
> How does this happen - does slurm not make sure all processes spawned by
> a job have finished at completi
