sinfo -lNe | grep idle | cut -d " " -f 1
On 25 May 2017 at 03:02, A wrote:
> Couldnt find this in the man,
>
> Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed),
> with sinfo?
On 25/05/17 05:12, Will French wrote:
> We have an alias setup that shows free and allocated nodes grouped by feature:
>
> sinfo --format="%55N %.35f %.6a %.10A"
Nice, here's an alternative that is more useful in our setup which
groups nodes by reason and GRES.
sinfo --format="%60N %.15G %.30E
We have an alias setup that shows free and allocated nodes grouped by feature:
sinfo --format="%55N %.35f %.6a %.10A"
> On May 24, 2017, at 2:04 PM, A wrote:
>
> Couldnt find this in the man,
>
> Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed), with
> sinfo?
thanks!
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Ole Holm Nielsen <
ole.h.niel...@fysik.dtu.dk> wrote:
>
> On 24-05-2017 21:03, A wrote:
>
>> Couldnt find this in the man,
>>
>> Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed),
>> with sinfo?
>>
>
> sinfo -t idle
>
On 24-05-2017 21:03, A wrote:
Couldnt find this in the man,
Whats the syntax for listing which nodes are free (not allocated/mixed),
with sinfo?
sinfo -t idle
On 08/11/16 11:42, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
>
> %CNumber of CPUs by state in the format
> "allocated/idle/other/total". Do not use this with a node state
> option ("%t" or "%T") or the different node states will be placed on
> separate lines.
>
> I presume I am doing something wrong?
I
Arg, I see now (hit send too soon). My parsing of the man page was wrong.
cheers
L.
--
The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this
way."
- Grace Hopper
On 8 November 2016 at 11:39, Lachlan Musicman wrote:
> Priority: Minor
>
> I notice that this command works
riginal Message-
From: Thomas M. Payerle [mailto:paye...@umd.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 12:07 PM
To: slurm-dev
Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo like behavior from scontrol
Something like
sacctmgr show user withassoc -p user=USERNAME --noheader | awk -F'|' '{ print
$
Something like
sacctmgr show user withassoc -p user=USERNAME --noheader | awk -F'|' '{ print
$6}'
should give you what you want.
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Eggleston, Nicholas J. wrote:
I?ve got kind of a weird question for you all. I?m in a place where I need to
know a list of all the partition
Hi Moe,
thank you. Can this format specifier also be used in the job name field?
Best,
Uwe
Am 16.09.2014 18:27, schrieb je...@schedmd.com:
>
> Documentation updated. see:
> https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/3e5864b6486bbd95ceacd695a503f85b3c0c4b8c
>
>
> Quoting Uwe Sauter :
>
Documentation updated. see:
https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/3e5864b6486bbd95ceacd695a503f85b3c0c4b8c
Quoting Uwe Sauter :
Hi all,
taken from the current 14.03.7 version of the sinfo manpage:
snip
-o , --format=
Specify the information to be displayed using an sinfo
Thanks, that's definitely a more general solution.
On 06/18/2014 05:39 PM, je...@schedmd.com wrote:
Thank you for the patch. A somewhat more general solution to this
problem will be in version 14.03.5 and can be found here:
https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/5351d393a67809371f14a40ca8b
Thank you for the patch. A somewhat more general solution to this
problem will be in version 14.03.5 and can be found here:
https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/5351d393a67809371f14a40ca8bb4e85f0c64018
Quoting Didier GAZEN :
Sorry, my previous post was truncated.
diff --git a/src/sinf
Sorry, my previous post was truncated.
diff --git a/src/sinfo/sinfo.c b/src/sinfo/sinfo.c
index 15a17dc..0643f62 100644
--- a/src/sinfo/sinfo.c
+++ b/src/sinfo/sinfo.c
@@ -573,6 +573,9 @@ static int _build_sinfo_data(List sinfo_list,
sinfo_cnt++;
slurm_mutex_unloc
19:53:44] error: slurm_receive_msg: Protocol version has changed,
> re-link your code
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> - Mail original -----
>> De: "Moe Jette"
>> À: "slurm-dev"
>> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 18:46:53
>> Objet: [slurm-de
[2013-10-08T19:53:44] error: slurm_receive_msg: Protocol version has changed,
re-link your code
Thanks.
- Mail original -
> De: "Moe Jette"
> À: "slurm-dev"
> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 18:46:53
> Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg
version of
slurmctld?
- Mail original -
> De: "Moe Jette"
> À: "slurm-dev"
> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 18:46:53
> Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were
> transmitted or received
>
>
> That means your slurmctl
À: "slurm-dev"
Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 17:29:53
Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes
were transmitted or received
The command and daemon are not communicating. Check your slurmctld
log
file. There is also a troubleshooting guide online that may
problem seems to
come from there.
Philippe
- Mail original -
> De: "Moe Jette"
> À: "slurm-dev"
> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 17:29:53
> Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were
> transmitted or received
>
>
>
.
root@kosmos:~# /etc/init.d/slurm-llnl status
slurmctld (pid 6093) is running...
slurmd (pid 6221) is running...
- Mail original -
De: "Danny Auble"
À: "slurm-dev"
Envoyé: Mardi 8 Octobre 2013 16:42:11
Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Byte
2013 16:42:11
> Objet: [slurm-dev] Re: sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were
> transmitted or received
>
> It doesn't appear your slurmctld is running or responsive.
>
>
> p.gamb...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I obtain the following er
It doesn't appear your slurmctld is running or responsive.
p.gamb...@ulg.ac.be wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>I obtain the following error message when I try to use SLURM.
>
>root@kosmos:~# sinfo
>sinfo: error: slurm_receive_msg: Zero Bytes were transmitted or
>received
>slurm_load_partitions: Zero Bytes wer
22 matches
Mail list logo
