On Friday, 16 November 2018 10:26:31 PM AEDT Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> So, is it still possible to use spank even when the code is compiled for
> x11?
No. You need to recompile Slurm without X11 support.
What does this command say?
scontrol show config | fgrep PrologFlags
> Does that mean every
So, is it still possible to use spank even when the code is compiled for
x11?
It seems that Rocks uses RSA keys. It also uses hostbasedauthentication.
[root@rocks7 ~]# cd /etc/ssh/
[root@rocks7 ssh]# ls
authorized_keys shosts.equiv ssh_host_ecdsa_key
ssh_host_ed25519_key.pub ssh_known_hosts
mod
It is compile\d with `-x11` else you get an error message that the
option is not supported. As said it only supports RSA-keys (hardcoded
in the src, libssh2 can handle more formats) and you must use short
hostnames. Another thing is we had to set:
* X11Parameters=local_xauthority
because we
Hello,
we use slurm 17.02.10 with
AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/filetxt. We've noticed that the
output from 'sacct --format=MaxVMSize,NCPUS' works for srun jobs, but
not for sbatch jobs. Has anyone a idea what the reason is?
Best regards,
Marcel
