On Tuesday, 5 March 2019 10:07:30 AM PST Brian Andrus wrote:
> Does anyone have a process they use to handle empty (aka "Unknown") end
> times for jobs that are not running?
What does:
sacctmgr list runawayjobs
say?
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Berkeley, CA, USA
On Tuesday, 5 March 2019 10:09:42 AM PST Matthew BETTINGER wrote:
> Everyone's qos is 'normal' so,
> sacctmgr show associations format=account,user,qos
That's listing the QOS they have access to, but you should check that their
defaultqos is also set to "normal" too.
Though if it wasn't then I
Hey there
Everyone's qos is 'normal' so,
sacctmgr show associations format=account,user,qos
Account User QOS
-- --
..
dgstaff j0458951 normal
ep l0525429 normal
...
We tried t
Hmm. I have it as an issue as well as several jobs that are in the db
without an end time, even though they are not running.
Not sure how that happened, but I do want to find a good way to clean it
up. Without and end time, sacct reports the jobs as if they continue to run
and the total elapsed tim
So here is a default partition
PartitionName=BDW
AllowGroups=ALL AllowAccounts=ALL AllowQos=ALL
AllocNodes=ALL Default=YES QoS=N/A
DefaultTime=01:00:00 DisableRootJobs=NO ExclusiveUser=NO GraceTime=0
Hidden=NO
MaxNodes=UNLIMITED MaxTime=1-00:00:00 MinNodes=1 LLN=NO
MaxCPUsPerNode=UNL
On 3/5/19 6:58 AM, Paul Edmon wrote:
We tried it once back when they first introduced it and shelved it after
we found that we didn't really need it.
Thanks Paul.
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Berkeley, CA, USA
On 3/5/19 7:37 AM, Matthew BETTINGER wrote:
Every time we attempt this no one can submit a job, slurm says waiting on
resources I believe.
We have accounting enabled and everyone is a member of the default qos group
"normal".
Is it also their default QOS?
Do you still have the slurmctld l
Hi
It might be useful to see the configuration of the partition and how the
QOS is set up... but at first blush I suspect you may need to set
OverPartQOS (https://slurm.schedmd.com/resource_limits.html) to get the QOS
limit to take precedence over the limit in the partition. However, the
"reason"
Hey slurm gurus. We have been trying to enable slurm QOS on a cray system here
off and on for quite a while but can never get it working. Every time we try
to enable QOS we disrupt the cluster and users and have to fall back. I'm not
sure what we are doing wrong. We run a pretty open system
We tried it once back when they first introduced it and shelved it after
we found that we didn't really need it.
-Paul Edmon-
On 3/4/19 2:26 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
Hi folks,
Anyone here tried Slurm's message aggregation (MsgAggregationParams in
slurm.conf) at all?
All the best,
Chri
10 matches
Mail list logo
