I would say so.
Certainly, if you have many nodes and/or many jobs being submitted, you
will see an impact, but in my experience comparing Slurm to SGE, Slurm
has much less overhead to cause as much impact.
Brian Andrus
On 2/26/2020 1:05 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:56pm, Brian Andrus wrote
Any shared filesystem that both systems can get to will work.
I have done it with NFS, Gluster, appliances (NetApp), etc.
Being in a separate datacenter is fine, but you will see some latency, which
you likely already addressed if you are
Any shared filesystem that both systems can get to will work.
I have done it with NFS, Gluster, appliances (NetApp), etc.
Being in a separate datacenter is fine, but you will see some latency,
which you likely already addressed if you are pysically splitting a
network like that.
Also, very
We're planning the migration of our moderately sized cluster (~400 nodes,
40K jobs/day) from SGE to slurm. We'd very much like to have a backup
slurmctld, and it'd be even better if our backup slurmctld could be in a
separate data center from the primary (though they'd still be on the same
We run Bright 8.1 and Slurm 17.11. We are trying to allow for multiple
concurrent jobs to run on our small 4 node cluster.
Based on
https://community.brightcomputing.com/question/5d6614ba08e8e81e885f1991?action=artikel=14=410=en=slurm+%2526%252334%253Bgang+scheduling%2526%252334%253B
and
So it sounds like the simplest approach would be to remove libcons_common
from the make file and copy cons_common.[ch] into my project and provide my
own implementations in the appropriate functions in cons_common.c.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:12 AM Jeffrey T Frey wrote:
> Did you reuse the
Sry, if this is a double post, but I have the impression my first email was
discarded, because I was not yet subscribed to the list - it did not show up in
the list archive.
From: Klein, Dennis
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 4:56 PM
To: slurm-us...@schedmd.com
Did you reuse the 20.02 select/cons_res/Makefile.{in,am} in your plugin's
source? You probably will have to re-model your plugin after the
select/cray_aries plugin if you need to override those two functions (it also
defines its own select_p_job_begin() and doesn't link against
Hi,
Thank you for your quick replies.
Please bear with me as I am a newbie regarding Slurm and Linux.
My hostname is not a FQDN and I´m running Slurm on a local node (slurmctld and
slurmuser are the same) just to verify that the X11-forwarding is working
(amongst other things).
The output of
