Dear Slurm Users,
I am experiencing a significant performance discrepancy when running
the same VASP job through the Slurm scheduler compared to running it
directly with mpirun. I am hoping for some insights or advice on how
to resolve this issue.
System Information:
Slurm Version: 21.08.5
OS: U
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 9:32 PM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> Dear Slurm Users,
>
> I am experiencing a significant performance discrepancy when running
> the same VASP job through the Slurm scheduler compared to running it
> directly with mpirun. I am hoping for some insights or advice on how
> to resol
Hi Zhao,
my guess is that in your faster case you are using hyperthreading
whereas in the Slurm case you don't.
Can you check what performance you get when you add
#SBATCH --hint=multithread
to you slurm script?
Another difference between the two might be
a) the communication channel/interf
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:02 AM Hermann Schwärzler via slurm-users
wrote:
>
> Hi Zhao,
>
> my guess is that in your faster case you are using hyperthreading
> whereas in the Slurm case you don't.
>
> Can you check what performance you get when you add
>
> #SBATCH --hint=multithread
>
> to you slu
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 7:50 AM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:02 AM Hermann Schwärzler via slurm-users
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Zhao,
> >
> > my guess is that in your faster case you are using hyperthreading
> > whereas in the Slurm case you don't.
> >
> > Can you check what perfor
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 9:49 AM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 7:50 AM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:02 AM Hermann Schwärzler via slurm-users
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Zhao,
> > >
> > > my guess is that in your faster case you are using hyperthreading
> >
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 10:06 AM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 9:49 AM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 7:50 AM Hongyi Zhao wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:02 AM Hermann Schwärzler via slurm-users
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Zhao,
> > > >
> >