Can't you just set the usage priority to be higher for the 2GB machines?
This way, if the requested memory is less than 2GB those machines will
be used first, and larger jobs skip to the higher memory machines.
On 11/21/19 9:44 AM, Jim Prewett wrote:
>
> Hi Sistemas,
>
> I could be mista
Are applications even aware when they've been hit by a SIGSTP? This
idea of a license being released under these circumstances just seems
very unlikely.
On 10/15/19 1:57 PM, Brian Andrus wrote:
> It seems that there are some details that would need addressed.
>
> A suspend signal is nothing mo
On 10/8/19 1:47 AM, Kota Tsuyuzaki wrote:
> GPU is running as well as gres gpu:1. And more, the NVIDIA docs looks to
> describe what I hit
> (https://docs.nvidia.com/deploy/mps/index.html#topic_4_3). That seems like
> the mps-server will be created to each user and the
> server will be running
On 9/19/19 8:22 AM, Thomas M. Payerle wrote:
> one of our clusters
> is still running RHEL6, and while containers based on Ubuntu 16,
> Debian 8, or RHEL7 all appear to work properly,
> containers based on Ubuntu 18 or Debian 9 will die with "Kernel too
> old" errors.
I think the idea generally is
On 8/29/19 9:38 AM, Jarno van der Kolk wrote:
> Here's an example on how to do so from the Compute Canada docs:
> https://docs.computecanada.ca/wiki/GNU_Parallel#Running_on_Multiple_Nodes
>
[name@server ~]$ parallel --jobs 32 --sshloginfile
./node_list_${SLURM_JOB_ID} --env MY_VARIABLE --workdir
On 8/27/19 11:47 AM, Brian Andrus wrote:
> 1) If you can, either use xargs or parallel to do the forking so you can
> limit the number of simultaneous submissions
>
Sorry if this is a naive question, but I'm not following how you would
use parallel with Slurm (unless you're talking about using
Why are you searching your miniconda environment for library files? All
the HDF5 stuff from the Arch package gets installed in standard library
locations.
On 7/23/19 9:47 PM, Weiguang Chen wrote:
> Thanks for you fast response.
> I have installed hdf5 by pacman -S hdf5
> (base) [zznu@archlinux
Sudo is more flexible than than; for example you can just give the
slurmduser sudo access to the chown command and nothing else.
On 7/8/19 11:37 AM, Daniel Torregrosa wrote:
> You are right. The critical part I was missing is that chown does not
> work without sudo.
>
> I assume this can be fix
There are 2 kinds of system admins: can do and can't do. You're a can
do; his are can't do.
On 3/21/19 10:26 AM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
>
> On 3/20/19 1:58 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
>> On 3/20/19 4:20 AM, Frava wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris, thank you for the reply.
>>> The team that manages that
But rsync -a will only help you if people are using identical or at
least overlapping data sets? And you don't need rsync to prune out old
files.
On 2/26/19 1:53 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On 22/02/2019 18.50, Will Dennis wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Not directly Slurm-related, but... We have a
I'm a little confused about how this would work. For example, where
does slurmctld run? And if on each submit host, why aren't the control
daemons stepping all over each other?
On 11/22/18 6:38 AM, Stu Midgley wrote:
> indeed.
>
> All our workstations are submit hosts and in the queue, so peo
11 matches
Mail list logo
