Re: [slurm-users] Question about PMIX ERROR messages being emitted by some child of srun process

Hi Tommi, Howard, On 5/22/23 12:16 am, Tommi Tervo wrote: 23.02.2 contains PMIx permission regression, it may be worth to check if it's case? I confirmed I could replicate the UNPACK-INADEQUATE-SPACE messages Howard is seeing on a test system, so I tried that patch on that same system

Re: [slurm-users] Question about PMIX ERROR messages being emitted by some child of srun process

> So I’m testing the use of Open MPI 5.0.0 pre-release with the Slurm/PMIx setup > currently on NERSC Perlmutter system. > > The SLURM version on Perlmutter is currently 2023.02.2 > > The PMIx version that the admins used to build slurm against is pmix-4.2.3. > I’ve attached the output of

[slurm-users] Question about PMIX ERROR messages being emitted by some child of srun process

HI, So I’m testing the use of Open MPI 5.0.0 pre-release with the Slurm/PMIx setup currently on NERSC Perlmutter system. First off, if I use the PRRte launch system, I don’t see the issue I’m raising here. But, many NERSC users prefer to use the srun “native” launch method with applications