List
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Verifying preemption WON'T happen
You can get some information on that from sdiag, and there are tweaks you can
make to backfill scheduling that affect how quickly it will get to a job.
That doesn’t really answer your real question, but might help you when you
settings I suppose
rob
From: slurm-users on behalf of
Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA)
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 3:14 PM
To: Slurm User Community List
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Verifying preemption WON'T happen
You don't often
From: slurm-users on behalf of
Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL (6393) Washington DC (USA)
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 3:14 PM
To: Slurm User Community List
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Verifying preemption WON'T happen
You don't often get email from noam.bernst
On Sep 29, 2023, at 2:51 PM, Davide DelVento
mailto:davide.quan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I don't really have an answer for you other than a "hallway comment", that it
sounds like a good thing which I would test with a simulator, if I had one.
I've been intrigued by (but really not looked much
I don't really have an answer for you other than a "hallway comment", that
it sounds like a good thing which I would test with a simulator, if I had
one. I've been intrigued by (but really not looked much into)
https://slurm.schedmd.com/SLUG23/LANL-Batsim-SLUG23.pdf
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:05
On our system, for some partitions, we guarantee that a job can run at least an
hour before being preempted by a higher priority job. We use the QOS preempt
exempt time for this, and it appears to be working. But of course, I want to
TEST that it works.
So on a test system, I start a lower
