Re: [Debian] 2.6.29 kernel

2009-06-14 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2009/6/14 Luca Capello : >> The problem itself is described (incl. fix) at ext4 mailinglist: >> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-ext4/2009/1/20/4774074/thread > From my quick view, it seems that the fix is not yet included in > upstream Linux kernel, but I could be wrong. It was actually in

Re: Deprecating xserver-glamo (was: Recording from headset when pressing headset button

2009-06-14 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2009/6/12 Luca Capello : >          This is a workaround for a Xglamo bug. This should be fixed >          in Xglamo and not in kernel space. > >          If unsure, say N. > > Can this be related to ? Not directly. I heard from Lindi that having that workaround not

Re: Deprecating xserver-glamo (was: Recording from headset when pressing headset button

2009-06-14 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Timo Jyrinki writes: > Not directly. I heard from Lindi that having that workaround not > disabled causes crash in rotating eventually, but not immediately. I > was able to xrandr -o left xrandr -o normal etc. many times even when > I uses kernel with that workaround enabled. Please see "xf86-vid

Re: Deprecating xserver-glamo (was: Recording from headset when pressing headset button

2009-06-14 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Timo! On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:50:58 +0200, Timo Jyrinki wrote: > 2009/6/12 Luca Capello : >> Can this be related to ? [...] > So I don't really know what's going on with that bug's filer. I filed that bug ;-) According to the xrandr manpage: RandR versio

Re: [Debian] 2.6.29 kernel

2009-06-14 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi Luca, On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 03:54:32AM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > Should a note be added to the Debian install.sh script or somewhere else > (Debian or Openmoko wiki)? while being at it should also be noted, that a recent qi version is needed to work together with gsm firmware moko11 and k

Re: Deprecating xserver-glamo (was: Recording from headset when pressing headset button

2009-06-14 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Timo! On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:04:33 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Timo Jyrinki writes: >> Not directly. I heard from Lindi that having that workaround not >> disabled causes crash in rotating eventually, but not immediately. I >> was able to xrandr -o left xrandr -o normal etc. many time

Re: xserver-xglamo: Please add right mouse button click

2009-06-14 Thread Luca Capello
tags 501247 + upstream thanks Hi Gilles! I cc:ed the smartphones-userland@ mailing lists to be sure everyone is aware of my decision and Rob Sims because he was the author of the patch. On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:22:59 +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:17:17 +0200, Gilles Filippini

[Debian] Packaging new frameworkd snapshot?

2009-06-14 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! I have just checked again fso-milestone5.5 roadmap: http://trac.freesmartphone.org/milestone/milestone5.5 There are 8 active tickets: 1 blocker (#381) and 7 in_testing (#416 and #435 for less than a week and all the others for more than for 4 weeks). Michael, would it be a good idea

Re: [Debian] Packaging new frameworkd snapshot?

2009-06-14 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Hi Luca, > Michael, would it be a good idea to update the Debian package with the > latest Git checkout or should we wait for milestone5.5? I have meant to update all of you on the current status, so I'll take this chance to do it. We're very near to completing fso milestone 5.5. Apart from the

Re: [Debian] Packaging new frameworkd snapshot?

2009-06-14 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi Michael, On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:08:23PM +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > fsousaged greatly improves stability of the framework (read the gory details > in #435), hence we need to ship it as part of ms5.5. very nice :) > fsodevice -- the successor for the device subsystem in framewor

Re: [Debian] Packaging new frameworkd snapshot?

2009-06-14 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Hi Sebastian, > > fsodevice -- the successor for the device subsystem in frameworkd -- is > > also almost ready and will give us a major boost on latency, but we won't > > delay 5.5 until then. > > while you are at it - what's the status of fsogsmd and fsotimed? fsogsmd: I created the basic chann