Re: frameworkd: Python-based components status (was Re: [debian] fso-usaged?)

2009-07-22 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Hi Luca, > For Debian, we need to > find the easiest upgreadable pathway from the Python-based frameworkd to > the Vala-based one. > > About this, what is the plan? I mean, as soon as a Vala-based module > has been implemented and work, should the Python-based one be > deprecated? Or the Python

Re: frameworkd: Python-based components status

2009-07-19 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Arne! On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:25:42 +0200, arne anka wrote: >> Have you compared that to upstream fso-ms5.5? For Debian, we need to >> find the easiest upgreadable pathway from the Python-based frameworkd to >> the Vala-based one. > > not sure, what you mean by "upstream fso-ms5.5" -- the only

Re: frameworkd: Python-based components status (was Re: [debian] fso-usaged?)

2009-07-19 Thread arne anka
Have you compared that to upstream fso-ms5.5? For Debian, we need to find the easiest upgreadable pathway from the Python-based frameworkd to the Vala-based one. not sure, what you mean by "upstream fso-ms5.5" -- the only one i got my hands on, were heiko's packages (thanks again!). in a se