frameworkd: Python-based components status (was Re: [debian] fso-usaged?)

2009-07-19 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:04:36 +0200, arne anka wrote: >> - add to /etc/framework.conf: >> [ousaged] >> disable = 1 >> >> [fsousage] >> >> [fsousage.controller] >> >> [cornucopia] > > no i see it, i get a dim recollection to have seen it before ... > anyway, it seems that either removing t

Re: frameworkd: Python-based components status (was Re: [debian] fso-usaged?)

2009-07-19 Thread arne anka
Have you compared that to upstream fso-ms5.5? For Debian, we need to find the easiest upgreadable pathway from the Python-based frameworkd to the Vala-based one. not sure, what you mean by "upstream fso-ms5.5" -- the only one i got my hands on, were heiko's packages (thanks again!). in a se

Re: frameworkd: Python-based components status (was Re: [debian] fso-usaged?)

2009-07-22 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Hi Luca, > For Debian, we need to > find the easiest upgreadable pathway from the Python-based frameworkd to > the Vala-based one. > > About this, what is the plan? I mean, as soon as a Vala-based module > has been implemented and work, should the Python-based one be > deprecated? Or the Python